Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Livestock mix seen as key to upland biodiversity in JHI and universities study

Livestock mix seen as key to upland biodiversity in JHI and universities study

Grazing a mixture of both cattle and sheep at low intensity has been suggested as the best approach to maintaining biodiversity in the British uplands.

That is the main finding from a 10-year study by ecologists at the James Hutton Institute (JHI) and the universities of Aberdeen and Hull.

The study report notes that species such as meadow pipits (a common upland songbird), field voles and red foxes live in a delicate balance that can easily be disrupted by changes in farming practices.

Although it is known that livestock grazing has a significant impact on the variety of plants and animals found in grassland areas the relationship is complicated, with different species affected in different ways.

This is apparently the first time ecologists have conducted a long-term, landscape-scale experiment looking at the consequences of livestock management on the multiple plant and animal groups that consume each other within a complex upland ‘food-web’.

The aim of the research, at the Glen Finglas estate in the Trossachs, was not to determine a single approach to livestock grazing that would result in a ‘win-win’ situation for all species, but rather an approach that provided the best possible trade-off between ‘winners’ and ‘losers’.

The researchers established separate blocks of land that were each designed to mimic a range of livestock grazing scenarios.

For 10 years, between 2002 and 2012, measurements including plant diversity, insect abundance, meadow pipit territories and signs of vole and fox activity were recorded in each experimental plot.

The study published this week in Ecosphere concluded that grazing a mixture of sheep and cattle, at low intensity, was the best trade-off between benefiting the meadow pipits and disadvantaging the voles and foxes, thereby maintaining the balance of biodiversity.

Professor Robin Pakeman from JHI said: “Our long-term experiment at the Woodland Trust’s Glen Finglas estate has clearly shown that decisions about grazing management affect plants, insects, voles, foxes and birds in different ways.

“Both increasing or decreasing the numbers of stock in the uplands will result in winners and losers.

“Our collaborative research can provide the basis for future decisions on supporting farming and biodiversity in our uplands.”

Dr Darren Evans, senior lecturer in conservation biology at Hull University, said: “It might be tempting to think that the most beneficial approach would be to stop grazing altogether in these upland areas, but actually that would be incredibly damaging in terms of conservation.”

He said these unique habitats have evolved as a result of traditional farming practices, and abandoning such areas would have a huge impact on the internationally important plants and animals living there.

Grazing cattle and sheep, rather than sheep alone, is particularly important, as the different feeding habits of these two animals means a whole range of plants and plant parts are consumed.

This prevents just a small number of plant species being grazed very hard while others are allowed to grow freely.

“This study supports some of our other research that shows that mixed livestock grazing systems also improve livestock productivity and reduce methane emissions,” Dr Evans said.

“We must remember that global food demands, particularly for meat, are increasing all the time, but commercial grazing must be balanced with conservation in these sensitive ecosystems.

“Often we hear that we must eat less meat in the future if we are to meet the increasing global food demand. This is probably true, but here we show that livestock farming is in itself an essential component of British biodiversity, and so certainly it’s important that we don’t abandon meat altogether.”