Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dundee V&A: MSP demands Holyrood inquiry into ‘debacle’ in wake of McClelland report

John McClelland (centre) releases his findings with (left) council chief executive David Martin and administration leader Councillor Ken Guild.
John McClelland (centre) releases his findings with (left) council chief executive David Martin and administration leader Councillor Ken Guild.

The ballooning budget at Dundee’s V&A should be investigated by the Scottish Parliament amid fears of a cover-up, according to a leading MSP.

Claire Baker has demanded “an urgent inquiry” into how the museum came to cost £80.1 million despite regular assurances from officials it would be built for £45 million.

The Labour member’s call comes after John McClelland listed a series of failings by Dundee City Council in their handling of the project.

Mrs Baker said: “The warning signs of escalating costs and delays to the V&A in Dundee were raised almost as soon as the winning design was announced.

“These warnings went unheeded.

“The fact that only SNP councillors, SNP MSPs and the SNP Government knew of the huge rise in public costs of the museum, but kept this information hidden from the public and opposition politicians is unacceptable.

“We were told that all designs were subjected to ‘exhaustive scrutiny’ and that the winning design was ‘buildable and practical’.

“We were also told, only weeks before the increase in cost was revealed to the Government, that the museum would be built to budget.

“The McClelland report now casts serious doubts on these claims.”

Ms Baker, who is Labour’s culture spokesperson, is now demanding the Scottish Parliament investigates the issue.

She added: “The education and culture committee must now do their job and hold an urgent inquiry to ensure who knew what and when, who was involved in the decision-making process and ultimately who is accountable.

“We need a full disclosure into the V&A debacle. The Scottish Government cannot be allowed to wash their hands of this whole affair.”

One of Dundee’s SNP MSPs, Joe FitzPatrick, pointed to Mr McClelland’s conclusion that the £80.1 million price tag was “credible” and added that he hoped people would now get behind the project.

He said: “The report is rigorous and has a number of important conclusions.

“One of the most important I think is the statement that he believes that for building this complex and sophisticated design an elite building for the city the contracted price is ‘credible’.

“Hopefully all parties can accept and implement the conclusions and move forward on this basis.”

Fellow Dundee MSP Shona Robison said: “Clearly this report has been comprehensive and has identified some shortcomings and difficulties with the transition between the design competition and the development of an agreed contracted cost.

“The report is also clear that this is a high-quality building project which will be iconic for the city. Let’s hope everyone can now get behind the project as it finally takes shape at the waterfront.”

But Dundee Labour councillor Richard McCready said the people of Dundee deserve answers.

Echoing Mrs Baker’s call, he said: “The Labour group on Dundee City Council’s biggest issue with the V&A project is that, given that we strongly support the V&A project, why were we excluded from information about the project time after time?

“A number of Labour councillors asked about the reality of the costs of the project and we were told on a number of occasions that the original figure of £45m was accurate. It is clear that this had not been the case for a very, very long time. Why was this information kept from the people of Dundee?”