Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Santa’s bell sparks fire regulations concerns

Santa’s bell sparks fire regulations concerns

Fife Council should face up to its responsibilities and carry out fire risk assessments in all the properties in its ownership and not pass the burden on to local volunteers who run halls.

That is the view of Taybridgehead councillor Maggie Taylor, who is relieved that something is going to be done to address deficiencies in proper fire procedures and risk assessments within all Fife community halls.

Mrs Taylor first raised the issue when it was realised that the smoke alarm system used in the Gregory Hall, Tayport, was the ringing of a bell.

This bell was the same one used to alert the children of the Tayport Playgroup using that hall that Santa was on his way.

This caused much confusion among the children when it was time to do their fire alarm instruction.

Subsequently, a report on fire safety in Fife Council community halls was prepared by Neil McFarlane, chief fire officer, and this highlighted the fact that very few of the halls have proper fire procedures and risk assessments in place.

There are 104 community halls, and an audit was done on eight of the halls owned and managed by Fife Council and three run by voluntary management committees.

Fire risk assessments were present in all of the sampled Fife Council directly-managed properties, although one was out of date.

Some of the fire risk assessments were not of a required standard.

None of the facilities operated by voluntary management committees were able to provide a fire risk assessment.

The records to demonstrate maintenance of the measures provided within the premises audited were not available on all occasions.

Deficiencies were identified in all but two of the premises.

In two of the premises, the lack of automatic fire Detection had been identified in the risk assessments, but was still a deficiency with no time-scaled action plan on addressing the issue.