Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish Government backed in fiscal framework talks

In this photo illustration, A man holds a Saltire flag outside the Scottish Parliament on May 6, 2009 in Edinburgh, Scotland. Today marks the 10th anniversary of the first Holyrood election polling day, before the Scottish Parliament gained full powers on July 1, 1999.
In this photo illustration, A man holds a Saltire flag outside the Scottish Parliament on May 6, 2009 in Edinburgh, Scotland. Today marks the 10th anniversary of the first Holyrood election polling day, before the Scottish Parliament gained full powers on July 1, 1999.

Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green members of the group which drew up Scotland’s new devolution package have broadly backed the Scottish Government’s position on a funding deal for the new powers.

The SNP administration is locked in negotiations with the UK Government over the fiscal framework which will accompany the Scotland Bill.

The governments must agree on how Scotland’s budget – the block grant – should be adjusted to take into account the new powers.

Any deal must meet the principles of taxpayer fairness and “no detriment” – the idea that neither government should gain or lose financially simply as a result of the decision to devolve.

The Scottish Government believes a method known as per capita indexed deduction, which would take into account the fact that Scotland’s population is growing more slowly than the rest of the UK, is the best way of meeting the no detriment principle.

It claims a bad deal, which fails to take population into account, could cost Scotland billions of pounds in the long-term.

The UK Government says a deal must be fair to all taxpayers and “no detriment” does not mean “no risk”.

Labour MSP and Smith Commission member Iain Gray told BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme: “To a degree, I think I largely agree with John Swinney on this position.

“What’s being talked about is a population trend which is in place and would be nothing to do with decisions that had been taken in Scotland, so, in my view, it does have to be factored into the discussions.”

Lib Dem member Tavish Scott said: “We are told that Scotland’s population will grow more slowly than other parts of the UK, so therefore, yes, it is logical that the new fiscal framework takes that into account. That would be a reasonable interpretation of no detriment.”

Green member Maggie Chapman said: “We heard time and time again during the referendum campaign that it would be better if Scotland voted No because we were all in this together.

“Under that principle, then, yes, the UK Government has a responsibility to ensure that whether it is population, whether it’s other factors, Scotland does not face detriment.”

Smith member Adam Tomkins, a Conservative, said: “The no detriment principle is a principle that must be applied equally to taxpayers in Scotland and to taxpayers in the rest of the United Kingdom, it is not a one-way insurance policy.”

Their comments come as a report by Westminster’s Scottish Affairs Committee warned the new funding deal for Scotland must not leave the country with risks it does not have the powers to mitigate for.

It found greater financial responsibility must be matched by enhanced borrowing powers and the principles of “no detriment” and taxpayer fairness must be met.

The committee called on the two governments to explore an adjusted version of the method favoured by Scottish ministers and recommended the operation of the new fiscal framework be reviewed after four years.