Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish Tories say 1970s North Sea oil prediction was ‘entirely accurate’

Denis Healey's comments have brought new accusations that the value of North Sea oil was deliberately under-estimated.
Denis Healey's comments have brought new accusations that the value of North Sea oil was deliberately under-estimated.

North Sea oil projections were not suppressed in the 1970s to head off the threat of Scottish nationalism, according to the Scottish Conservative Party.

Former Labour Chancellor Denis Healey caused a stir amongst Scottish nationalists last week when he claimed that his Treasury “did underplay the value of the oil to the country because of the threat of nationalism”.

The amount of oil extracted by 1980 was within the Treasury’s early estimates, according to the Tories, but the SNP insist that its monetary contribution to the UK economy was undervalued.

In 1973 Tory Minister for Industry Tom Boardman predicted that “a most likely range of oil production in 1980 of 70 million to 100 million tons”, in response to a parliamentary question (PQ) by then Labour MP and later nationalist stalwart Jim Sillars.

Historical statistics from the UK Department for Energy show that UK oil output in 1980 was 80.47 tons, well within the early estimates according to Tory deputy leader Jackson Carlaw.

However, the Tories had also dismissed SNP predictions that oil would contribute up to £2,400 million to the economy by 1980 when the actual figure was £2,700 million, according to SNP MSP Maureen Watt.

Mr Carlaw said: “The view that the value of oil was played down can now be completely dismissed. Those claims come from a discredited former Labour chancellor, who was one of the architects of the 1970s economic disaster Margaret Thatcher had to clear up.

“The figures show very clearly that the UK Government made a public estimate, which was gleefully quoted by both the SNP and Labour at the time.

“Yet history demonstrates that this estimate was entirely accurate after all, proving suggestions that the worth of oil was somehow played down are well wide of the mark.

“The SNP should really undertake some proper research before jumping to wild conclusions based on an unreliable source they themselves voted out of office in a no-confidence motion in 1979.”

Ms Watt said: “Denis Healey wasn’t Chancellor and the Labour party were not in office when this PQ was answered, and it predates the McCrone report which was kept secret for over 30 years because of the ‘the extreme sensitivity of the subject’ as its very own author wrote.

“It shows an incredible level of panic that the Tories describe the man who was Chancellor of the Exchequer for over half the 1970s as an ‘unreliable’ source.

“Nor does it recognise how the Tories tried to play down the value of Scotland’s oil revenues. The SNP remember how the Tories attacked an SNP prediction that oil taxation and royalties might be in the range of £825m to £2400m by 1980. In the event the actual figure was £2700m.

“The Tories protest too much. Their desperation to refute the claim says everything about how sensitive they are – with good reason – to the suggestion they, and other Westminster Governments, do not act in Scotland’s best interests.”