Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

College merger savings ‘unclear’

The report says there has been little negative impact on students as a result of the changes.
The report says there has been little negative impact on students as a result of the changes.

It is unclear what savings have been achieved by college mergers beyond staff cuts or what the full costs of the mergers have been, the public spending watchdog has said.

Colleges have coped well with the significant reforms and maintained sound finances and learning but still face challenges, according to Audit Scotland.

The Scottish Government and the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) expect the mergers to reduce duplication, improve engagement with employers and outcomes for students.

It also predicts financial savings of about £50 million a year from 2015-16.

Audit Scotland said: “A large proportion of the savings have come from reductions in staff, with the biggest reduction being teaching staff costs.

“However, it is unclear what savings have been achieved in addition to reduced staffing costs and what the full costs of the merger process are as there are no systems in place either at individual colleges or centrally to collect this information.

“It is also unclear what progress there has been in achieving some of the wider benefits expected from the mergers.”

It added: “The Scottish Government and the SFC have not specified the measures they will use to assess progress in delivering all of the expected benefits of the mergers.

“Neither could they provide us with details of the expected level of change required for mergers to be considered successful.

“The lack of baseline information for some of the expected benefits will also make it difficult to fully assess and report on improvement.

“The Scottish Government indicated that it will draw on existing data sources, including financial data and college performance indicators, to assess progress.

“While it should be possible to extract information on savings and student outcomes from existing data sources, it is not clear how the Scottish Government and the SFC will measure the wider benefits, such as reduced duplication and improved engagement with employers.”

Reducing the number of incorporated colleges to 20 and creating 13 new college regions has had implications for funding, learning provision and how colleges are managed and scrutinised, Audit Scotland said.

Colleges’ planning for mergers was generally good and carried out on time, with the changes to date having little negative impact on students.

Reductions in staff costs were achieved mainly through voluntary severances and auditors found weaknesses in how a small number of colleges had managed severance payments for senior staff.

Caroline Gardner, Auditor General for Scotland, said: “The last few years have placed significant demands on colleges in Scotland as they managed a complex programme of reform.

“Our report is intended to support them in learning from how these reforms were delivered and addressing areas that need to improve.

“In the main, colleges coped well with substantial changes to the way they work, maintaining sound finances and completing mergers on time, without negatively affecting students during the process.

“Many of the effects of the mergers are still taking place, however, and there are continuing challenges for the sector.

“It’s important that the Scottish Government and the SFC work with colleges to measure and publicly report on whether the reforms have delivered all of the intended benefits.”