Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Attitude and standard of argument insulting

Attitude and standard of argument insulting

Sir, I recorded the independence debate for convenience, but the few snippets I saw on news broadcasts led me to delete it, and I certainly won’t watch the “return leg”.

I don’t care whether Scotland becomes independent or not: our dogma-driven politicians will bungle everything as before.

What does concern me is the quality of argument deployed, in which respect I was appalled by Alistair Darling’s new “tough guy” performance.

Personalising an argument is one of the weakest and most dishonest forms of debating.

When Alex Salmond mentioned Scotland getting governments it didn’t vote for, Mr Darling replied that he didn’t vote for “him” (Mr Salmond), but that he was stuck with “him” (not the SNP government).

He then belittled the First Minister on the subject of currency by comparing him negatively with an eight-year-old child, who, he claimed, could rattle off the flag description, capital city and currency of foreign countries.

Really? Well, Brazil recently had long-term publicity through the football World Cup: how many readers of this paper, let alone enthusiastic eight-year-old fans, could supply these three details about Brazil?

It may well be that Mr Salmond was equally guilty of substandard argument. Either way, I take this attitude as an insult.

Robert Dow. Ormiston Road, Tranent.

Celebrities are irrelevant

Sir, Your two-page article listing all the “celebrities” who are saying Scotland should say “no” in the forthcoming election is totally irrelevant. Why should the opinion of a “celebrity” be of any interest to me? He or she is just another person doing a job, be it acting, singing, taking part in sport or something else.

That they may earn a lot of money doing that job only emphasises the fact that they do not live in the same world as I do, so their opinions are of little interest to me and are not at all likely to assist me in making up my mind.

Now if you were to publish the opinions of local mechanics, doctors, shopkeepers, council workers, teachers or deckhands from fishing boats they may be relevant to me, and be of use in making my decision.

Please spare us the “celebrity” opinions, be they pro or anti independence. They have no relevance to the ordinary people of Scotland who will bear the brunt of the referendum result, whichever way it goes.

Captain Ian F McRae. 17 Broomwell Gardens, Monikie.

More important issue is the EU

Sir, If all those celebrities would only give their support to our continued membership of the EU as well! That is a far more important economic (and therefore, in the long term, social) issue than Scottish independence.

If we (Scotland or Britain) left the EU, it would be an economic disaster.

I shall, therefore, vote according to whether I think the UK or an independent Scotland is more likely to remain in the EU. Unfortunately, I find that impossible to calculate at the moment.

It looks as if the UK may vote for exit, but would an independent Scotland be allowed to remain in the EU pending re-negotiation? So far as I can see, that is anyone’s bet.

Nationalists can crow about social justice as much as they want, but if the economy declines the poor will surely get poorer.

Antony Black. 79 Blackness Avenue, Dundee.

The reasons for armed police?

Sir, I am still one of the undecided as far as the forthcoming referendum is concerned, but the recent controversy over armed police in the streets has got me thinking that perhaps it’s one of two things.

1. The Chief Constable of Police Scotland is anticipating that the run-up to and after the referendum will turn out like what is happening in the Ukraine at present where neighbour has turned against neighbour.

2. A conspiracy theory that the UK Government has instructed the Police to do so, so as to create fear in the population that this will be the norm if they vote “yes”.

Just a thought.

John Ritchie. 131 Bridge Street, Montrose.

A complete fairy story

Sir, I have received a copy of the Scottish Government’s “booklet” on Scotland’s Future; full of unsubstantiated claims and mythology! The summary at the end emphasising their beliefs is interesting for one startling reason: they have omitted “We believe in Fairies”!

Harry Davey. 12 Dores Drive, Broughty Ferry.

Plan B takes the biscuit!

Sir, Currency Plan B. Tunnock’s Tea Cakes.

Malcolm Parkin. 15 Gamekeepers Road, Kinnesswood, Kinross.