Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Blairgowrie culture centre supporters have ‘more questions than answers’ on why bid was rejected

Blairgowrie and Rattray Community Council chairwoman Morag Young outside the former Hill Primary School.
Blairgowrie and Rattray Community Council chairwoman Morag Young outside the former Hill Primary School.

A confidential report released by Perth and Kinross Council to show why it controversially rejected a community-led regeneration bid has been slammed for “raising more questions than answers”.

The Ericht Trust had widespread support for its plan to take over Blairgowrie’s old Hill Primary School and convert it into a multi-million-pound heritage and cultural hub.

Volunteers lodged their proposal with council chiefs after three-and-a-half years of planning and fundraising.

However, the community charity was dealt a major blow last month when it emerged council chiefs had rejected the plan in favour of a housing development.

The decision was taken during a private meeting of the council’s property sub-committee at the end of October.

The Courier has obtained a copy of the report issued to councillors at the meeting following a Freedom of Information request.

However, the paper has been heavily redacted with huge chunks of text, including entire sections on funding, economic benefits, conclusions and recommendations withheld.

A council spokesman said: “The majority of the report remains commercially sensitive as negotiations are not yet complete.

“The disclosure of this information would inhibit the ability of the council to operate in a market where the confidentiality of negotiations is expected, at least until they are completed.”

Blairgowrie and Rattray Community Council had hoped the report would explain why the trust’s bid had been rejected.

Chairwoman Morag Young said: “Unfortunately, this report raises more questions than answers. For such a significant project, we would expect more transparency and openness.

“We are now hoping to arrange a meeting with officials from the council who might be able to explain why this housing plan was voted for in favour of the Ericht Trust’s development.

“We have nothing against the housing developers, but we just feel that the community would have benefited more from the creation of a heritage and cultural centre. People should be told the reasons why this plan was rejected.”

More than 6,000 hours of volunteers’ time and at least 230 hours of pro bono work from professionals went into the trust’s application.

The plans included a cinema, arts and crafts workplace, cafe, shop and function hall.

Earlier this year, the trust said the revised cost of the project was about £4.8m. The plan had already won support from, among others, SSE, the Architectural Heritage Fund, the Heritage Dragons and the Association of Industrial Archaeologists.