Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

St Andrews hotel and student accommodation plan ‘based on avarice’, says report

Residents of the Abbey Park Avenue Development are up in arms over plans to build student accomdation and a new hotel in Abbey Walk. 
Picture shows; Residents of the Abbey Park Avenue Development with Dr Sandra Stewart.
Residents of the Abbey Park Avenue Development are up in arms over plans to build student accomdation and a new hotel in Abbey Walk. Picture shows; Residents of the Abbey Park Avenue Development with Dr Sandra Stewart.

Plans for a new hotel and student accommodation in the heart of St Andrews have been slammed as a “design development based on avarice”, according to a new study.

Campaigners opposed to the blueprint for the Abbey Park project have commissioned a report on the proposals that has concluded the development will be “completely insensitive to the conservation area”.

They also note Austin-Smith: Lord, the architectural and conservation consultants who prepared the report, were actually employed by prospective developers Robertson Homes to set the design standards which guided the entire redevelopment of the brownfield site, now known as Abbey Park, when it was approved in 2007.

Sandra Stewart, communications officer of the Abbey Park Residents Action Group, said: “This is surely a game-changer for Fife Council in their consideration of this much-criticised planning application.

“Austin-Smith: Lord are a highly prestigious architectural and conservation firm, but what makes their verdict doubly important is that they actually drew up the design parameters for the Abbey park site when the developer received original planning permission.

“If the firm which achieved the successful delivery of the Strategic Development Framework for the whole St Leonards site is now saying that ‘economic gain has overridden sensible and intelligent responses to the site’s requirements and constraints’ then surely this application is holed below the water line?”

The newly-commissioned report criticises the proposed hotel and halls of residence as “bland and immature” and describes it as “characterless”. At four storeys high, it will dominate visual amenity, it adds.

It also suggests the application represents over-development of the site in the conservation area and further points out access issues have not been resolved.

The fiercest criticism has been reserved for Fife Council planners who, according to information received by AFRAG under Freedom of Information, had “encouraged that the architecture should not replicate the surrounding buildings”, despite the council’s own guidance noting the “historicist approach had provided real quality to the current St Leonards site”.

A spokesperson said Fife Council could not comment before the application is considered by a meeting of North East Fife planning committee, likely to be held on May 29.

Katherine MacKintosh, managing director of Robertson Property, said: “The delivery of new student accommodation and a new hotel is the final piece in the jigsaw for the housing led redevelopment of the Abbey Park site.

“We have had positive dialogue throughout the planning process with Fife Council and have diligently fulfilled our obligations under the Strategic Development Framework and FIFEplan. We have also openly engaged with the near neighbours and the wider local community.

“Following the pre-application consultation in October 2017, the proposed scheme was amended to take account of residents’ views  including the relocation of the student accommodation and introduction of a large public space between the proposed buildings and Orchard Row together with enhanced landscaping.

“We await the determination of the planning application in early course.”