Another week, another new Audi. Two new Audis, in fact. The German car maker has announced a couple more additions to its Q line up of SUVs. The Q4 is a coupe-SUV hybrid that will go up against the BMW X4 and Mercedes GLC Coupe. As its name suggests, it’ll be positioned between the compact Q3 and bigger Q5. At the other end of the scale is the Q8, which will go head to head against the Range Rover. It’s lower and sleeker than the Q7 Audi is also producing. In concept form, it sat only four people, although it seems likely the production version will be a five seater. There’s a 630 litre boot as well. Eagle eyed Audi followers will notice the only SUV slots left to fill are the Q1 and Q6. Watch this space...
Audi’s Q2 was one of the first premium compact SUVs on the market. It sits below the Q3, Q5 and the gigantic, seven seat Q7 in Audi’s ever growing range. Although it’s about the same size as the Nissan Juke or Volkswagen T-Roc, its price is comparable with the much larger Nissan X-Trail or Volkswagen Tiguan. Even a basic Q2 will set you back more than £21,000 and top whack is £38,000. Then there’s the options list which is extensive to say the least. My 2.0 automatic diesel Quattro S Line model had a base price of £30,745 but tipped the scales at just over £40,000 once a plethora of additions were totted up. Size isn’t everything, however. In recent years there’s been a trend of buyers wanting a car that’s of premium quality but compact enough to zip around town. It may be a step down in size but the Q2 doesn’t feel any less classy than the rest of Audi’s SUV range. The interior looks great and is user friendly in a way that more mainstream manufacturers have never been able to match. The simple rotary dial and shortcut buttons easily trounce touchscreen systems, making it a cinch to skim through the screen’s menus. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eQ5p5Z7-Ek&list=PLUEXizskBf1nbeiD_LqfXXsKooLOsItB0 There’s a surprising amount of internal space too. I took three large adults from Dundee to Stirling and no one complained about feeling cramped. As long as you don’t have a tall passenger behind a tall driver you can easily fit four adults. At 405 litres the boot’s big too – that’s 50 litres more than a Nissan Juke can muster. Buyers can pick from 1.0 and 1.4 litre petrol engines or 1.6 and 2.0 litre TDIs. Most Q2s are front wheel drive but Audi’s Quattro system is standard on the 2.0 diesel, as is a seven-speed S Tronic gear box. On the road there’s a clear difference between this and SUVs by manufacturers like Nissan, Seat and Ford. Ride quality, while firm, is tremendously smooth. Refinement is excellent too, with road and tyre noise kept out of the cabin. It sits lower than the Q3 or Q5 and this improves handling, lending the Q2 an almost go-kart feel. On a trip out to Auchterhouse, with plenty of snow still on the ground, I was appreciative of the four-wheel drive as well. The Q2 is expensive – though there are some good finance deals out there – but you get what you pay for. Few cars this small feel as good as the Q2 does. Price: £30,745 0-62mph: 8.1 seconds Top speed: 131mph Economy: 58.9mpg CO2 emissions: 125g/km
Standing out from the crowd on Tinder can be tough, but with the help of Microsoft PowerPoint a British student has managed just that – and gone viral in the process.Sam Dixey, a 21-year-old studying at Leeds University, made a six-part slideshow entitled “Why you should swipe right” – using pictures and bullet points to shrewdly persuade potential dates to match with him on the dating app. The slideshow includes discussion of his social life and likes, such as “petting doggos” and “laser tag”, and “other notable qualities and skills” – such as being “not the worst at sex” and “generous when drunk”.It even has reviews mocked up from sources such as “Donald Trump”, “Leonardo Di Capri Sun” and “The Times Guide to Pancakes 2011”.Sam told the Press Association the six-slide presentation only took about 20 minutes to make and “started off as a joke”.However, since being posted to Twitter by fellow Tinder user Gracie Barrow, Sam’s slideshow has been shared tens of thousands of times across social media.So, it’s got the seal of approval form Gracie, but how has the slideshow fared on Tinder? “I’d have to say it has been pretty successful,” Sam said. “Definitely a clear correlation of matches and dates beforehand to afterwards.“Most of the responses tend to revolve around people saying ‘I couldn’t help swipe right 10/10’ but I’ve had some people go the extra mile and message me on Facebook.“Plus some people have recognised me outside, in the library and on dates.”A resounding success.
Scotland stunned the 6 Nations in lifting their first Calcutta Cup in a decade with their biggest win over the Auld Enemy England in 32 years in a pulsating and thrilling contest at BT Murrayfield. It was a complete performance by the Scottish team, recovering most of the verve and cutting edge they had in the Autumn Tests during a remarkable first half, and then hanging on with some brave and determined defence in the old tradition in the second. The tries all came in the first half with two from Huw Jones – the centre now has 10 in just 13 tests – and the other from Sean Maitland, but the play was superbly orchestrated by the mercurial Finn Russell, who after two poor games in this 6 Nations was named man of the match. He was barely ahead of a bunch of his team-mates, notably Jones, Hamish Watson, Jonny Gray and skipper John Barclay, who was a titan in defence as the Scots held on to what they had in a torrid second half. England were relentless as expected, but they only once pierced Scotland’s defence and they gave away simply far too many penalties to stay in with a chance of winning the game. Scotland got the ideal start, Mako Vunipola caught holding on as he tried to exit his own 22 by Gilchrist, and Laidlaw landed the penalty. Scotland’s pirating – through Watson this time – stalled England’s response but McInally was caught in similar fashion as they threatened with Russell starting to prompt well. The next time the Scots tried to steal ball on the deck Watson was a fraction too late and penalised, Farrell levelling the scores on 13 minutes. But the Scots responded with the opening try, having a penalty advantage at a lineout ball inside the England half and chancing their arm. Referee Nigel Owens nearly got in the way but Russell’s clever grubber was nudged on by Jones’ left foot and it bounced perfectly for the centre to regather and score under the posts, Laidlaw converting. Straight from the kick-off the Scots were too eager and offside at the exit and Farrell pegged them back with the penalty. But the home side looked far more likely than the visitors to score and nearly did again when Jones kicked down the right touchline only for Ford and Watson to combine to clear up. But the Scots did strike from their own half just after the half hour mark when Russell’s long looped pass sent Jones racing clear, only to be caught in the 22 by Brown. However the Scots recycled quickly, McInally drove forward and another floated pass from Russell put Maitland in at the corner for an unconverted score. England’s next promising attack ended with a silly takeout penalty from Brown on Watson, and then Barclay pirated more ball as England tried to get back into the game. Instead with two minutes to go before half time the Scots struck again in spectacular style, Laidlaw’s flat pass sending Jones through Nathan Hughes’ poor tackle at full pace, and the centre thrillingly fought off both Brown and Watson to get to the line for the try. Laidlaw converted and the Scots left the field at half-time to an ecstatic standing ovation from the Murrayfield crowd. England weren’t about to go quietly though as a scuffle in the tunnel showed, and they came out with renewed vigour for the second half, Farrell blasting through for a try he converted himself after concerted pressure from the men in white. Twice Scottish hearts were in mouths soon after as Care intercepted Laidlaw only to be called back for a penalty at the breakdown, and then Farrell seemed to have his second score before the TMO spotted Courtney Lawes had knocked on making a huge tackle in midfield. But the Scots, while under pressure on their own ball, stayed strong and penalties kept coming their way, with replacement Sam Underhill shown a yellow card for a shoulder charge on Scottish sub Jamie Bhatti. Russell took over kicking duties as Laidlaw had gone off, and made the simple penalty to take his side 12 points ahead. England put on all their “finishers” and one relentless series of phases moved them from their own 22 to the shadow of the Scottish posts, but they were halted there by McInally’s steal to clinch a famous victory. Att: 67,300 Scotland: S Hogg; T Seymour, H Jones, P Horne, S Maitland; F Russell, G Laidlaw; G Reid, S McInally, S Berghan; G Gilchrist, J Gray; J Barclay (capt), H Watson, R Wilson. Replacements: S Lawson (unused), J Bhatti for Reid 56, WP Nel for Berghan 69, T Swinson for Gilchrist 56, D Denton for Wilson 69, A Price for Laidlaw 63, N Grigg for Horne 72, B Kinghorn for Seymour 65. England: M Brown; A Watson, J Joseph, O Farrell, J May; G Ford, D Care; M Vunipola, D Hartley (capt), D Cole; J Launchbury, M Itoje; C Lawes, C Robshaw, N Hughes. Replacements: J George for Hartley 55, J Marler for Vunipola 70, H Williams for Cole 65, G Kruis for Launchbury 72, S Underhill for Hughes 55, R Wigglesworth for Care 72, B Te’o for Brown 66, J Nowell for Ford 66. Ref: N Owens (WRU)
Audi’s relentless release of new models continues with the launch of its smallest SUV. The Q2 goes on sale in the UK next week with prices starting at £22,380. There’s an extensive selection of petrol and diesel power trains as well as the option of front or Quattro four-wheel drive. More models will be added to the range later on, including powerful SQ2 and RSQ2 versions. Aimed squarely at a younger audience, the Q2 has bolder, sharper lines and a different shape to Audi’s bigger SUVs, the Q3, Q5 and Q7. Although it’s clearly meant more for buzzing around cities than growling across farmland, cladding and skid plates lend it an aura of ruggedness. Audi is also offering a range of vibrant colours to deepen the Q2’s appeal to youthful buyers. The interior is as plush as you’d expect from Audi, justifying its price hike over similarly sized SUVs like the Nissan Juke and Honda HR-V. The materials are high quality – softtouch plastics, leather on higher spec cars and brushed aluminium trim elements all blended into a smart-looking package. As standard, drivers get a seven-inch infotainment screen on top of the dashboard. It’s operated through Audi’s rotary dial system that’s far more intuitive and easier to use when on the move than rivals’ touchscreen systems. Among the many options is Audi’s excellent Virtual Cockpit - a 12.3in screen that replaces the manual instruments behind the steering wheel. Overall, the Q2 is 4.7in shorter than the A3 hatchback, but Audi says there’s enough leg and headroom for two adult passengers in the back. Boot space comes in at 405 litres – 50 more than you’ll find in the A3 hatchback and rival Nissan Juke, although it trails the Mini Countryman by the same amount. To begin with, the only diesel option is a 1.6 litre with 114bhp, although a more powerful 184bhp 2.0 litre unit will be added to the range soon. Similarly, the petrol engine range is limited for now but will be expanded by the end of the year. The 1.4 litre, 148bhp unit offered now will be joined by 1.0 litre, 114bhp three cylinder turbo and 2.0 litre, 187bhp options – the latter coming with an S-Tronic automatic gearbox. When it arrives the 1.0 litre petrol version will be the cheapest model in the range with a price tag of £20,230. Courier Motoring has yet to get its hands on the car but early reviews have been very positive and Audi looks to have yet another winner on its hands. email@example.com
A Dundee man was sacked while on sick leave following the murder of one of his friends and the disappearance of a close friend's son when his bosses found out he had gone to a gin festival. Stan Reid was off work due to stress associated with the hunt for teenager Ralph Smith, who had fallen from cliffs near Arbroath, and the subsequent killings of Julie McCash and David Sorrie following a vigil at the teenager's family home in Whitfield. However, bosses at the city's Michelin factory learned he had attended a gin festival and fired him for gross misconduct. An employment tribunal in Dundee yesterday heard the company was alerted to a Facebook post, in which Mr Reid was tagged, that suggested he was at the event in Glasgow. A comment from him, stating "I'm not there", was followed by a comment from his girlfriend which said "shhh...." The factory's production manager and joint disciplinary committee (JDC) chairman David Ashforth said the messages suggested Mr Reid was not as sick as his employers had been led to believe. He said: "For me and the panel, we felt that if he could go to a gin festival then he could go to his work. "I understand the circumstances around this were difficult but why was going to a gin festival a good idea?" The tribunal, heard by Peter Wallington QC, was told Mr Reid had been certified as sick due to stress as a result of the disappearance and murders. Mr Reid was a major part of the search effort for 18-year-old Ralph Smith— who he had known since his birth — in circumstances described by his solicitor Ryan Russell as "incredibly distressful." The tragedy was compounded when Ms McCash and Mr Sorrie were murdered. One month later, Ralph's death was confirmed after his body washed up on the town's Victoria Park. A second witness, Michelin's development manager Stuart Duncan, said he did not believe Mr Reid was sick but did not question the authenticity of his certification. Mr Russell questioned this rationale and criticised Mr Duncan's failure to follow company procedure when he dismissed Mr Reid. Mr Duncan said he had already made the decision to dismiss him following the JDC, despite Mr Reid being told he would be given the opportunity to argue his case. Mr Russel said: "I would put it to you that this is shocking. "It's a complete and utter disregard for all proper process. You just dismissed Mr Reid before he had even uttered a word. He was not given a fair crack of the whip." Mr Duncan responded that his understanding was that the meeting was simply to "deliver my decision". The tribunal continues today.
First there was the Q7. Then the Q5 and Q3. All have been a phenomenal success for Audi. I’d be surprised if that script changes when the Q2 arrives in November. Audi’s baby SUV is available to order now with prices starting at £22,380. Can’t quite stretch to that? Don’t worry, an entry level three-cylinder 1.0 litre version will be available later this year with a cover tag of £20,230. From launch, there are three trim levels available for the Q2 called SE, Sport and S Line. The range-topping Edition #1 model will be available to order from next month priced from £31,170. While the entry-level 113bhp 1.0-litre unit isn’t available right away, engines you can order now include a 113bhp 1.6-litre diesel and 148bhp 1.4-litre petrol unit, both with manual or S tronic automatic transmissions. Also joining the Q2 line-up from September is the 2.0-litre TDI diesel with 148bhp or 187bhp. This unit comes with optional Quattro all-wheel drive. A 2.0 litre petrol with Quattro and S tronic joins the range next year. Standard equipment for the new Audi Q2 includes a multimedia infotainment system with rotary/push-button controls, supported with sat-nav. Audi’s smartphone-friendly interface, 16in alloy wheels, Bluetooth connectivity and heated and electric mirrors are all also standard for the Audi. Along with the optional Audi virtual cockpit and the head-up display, the driver assistance systems for the Audi Q2 also come from the larger Audi models – including the Audi pre sense front with pedestrian recognition that is standard. The system recognises critical situations with other vehicles as well as pedestrians crossing in front of the vehicle, and if necessary it can initiate hard braking – to a standstill at low speeds. Other systems in the line-up include adaptive cruise control with Stop & Go function, traffic jam assist, the lane-departure warning system Audi side assist, the lane-keeping assistant Audi active lane assist, traffic sign recognition and rear cross-traffic assist.
The UK Government can no longer ignore calls for urgent tax changes that could spark a “resurgence” in the North Sea oil industry, Nicola Sturgeon has said. Scotland’s First Minister claimed it was clear that “urgent fiscal stimulus” was needed to increase exploration work. Senior UK Government ministers have already hinted that measures to help the North Sea could be included in George Osborne’s Budget next month. But politicians at Holyrood are continuing to press the case for action to help the crucial industry. As part of that, Ms Sturgeon has taken her Scottish Cabinet team to Aberdeen, where the oil industry is based, visiting a pipeline support service provider in the city with Deputy First Minister John Swinney. The First Minister argued that “simple steps” taken by ministers in Norway a decade ago had reversed a decline in oil and gas exploration work in the country. With the equivalent of 24 billion barrels of oil said to remain in the North Sea, she said action was needed to encourage companies to continue to invest in the area. The Scottish Government is calling for the headline rate of tax on the industry to be reduced as well as the introduction of an investment allowance and a new tax credit for exploration. Ms Sturgeon said: “I believe that North Sea oil is a fantastic asset for Scotland and will continue to be so for decades to come. “There are up to 24 billion barrels of oil and gas equivalent remaining, and it is essential we have a stable and proportionate fiscal regime which encourages the investment, innovation and exploration required. “But we need action now from the UK Government to help ensure we maximise future production and economic recovery. “Quite frankly, the UK Government has failed to address the exploration problem in the North Sea.” The First Minister, speaking as she visited Pipelines 2 Data in Aberdeen, added: “It cannot be clearer that urgent fiscal stimulus is required to improve the exploration outlook. “Around 40% of production is expected to come from new field developments by 2018: that’s only three years away. “Fiscal measures to incentivise exploration, coupled with the appropriate regulatory expertise, have the potential to drive forward a resurgence in exploration in the North Sea. “We only have to look at the situation in Norway in 2005 to see that simple steps can be taken to restore a decline in exploration. “In the course of three years, the introduction of the exploration tax credit saw the number of exploration wells increase an incredible fourfold.” Ms Sturgeon said industry expert Sir Ian Wood had recently warned that as many as six billion barrels of oil reserves could be lost “unless radical measures are taken by the UK Government”.
Today's letters to The Courier. Sir, - Malcolm McCandless (Letters, August 6), is very quick to stick the knife into Johann Lamont, the Scottish Labour leader. However, a poll looking at one party and listing ''untrustworthy'', ''out of touch'', ''incompetent'' and ''boring'' as options is clearly biased and focused on achieving a destructive outcome, for whatever reason. When you ask people leading questions, you will get a biased answer. If you were to ask the Scottish public whether they trusted Alex Salmond, there would almost certainly be a very significant number, even within his own party, who would reply in the negative. I watched Johann Lamont in one of the televised leadership debates earlier this year and even as a member of another party, I have to say that the audience reacted very well to her good humour and groundedness, and it was obvious to me that she had learned the lessons from 2011. Their election results demonstrate this, gaining even in Perth and Kinross. Johann Lamont is very obviously persuaded that our future lies with a better devolved settlement, not with the country being independent. Be that right or wrong, she appears clear and sincere in her beliefs and we should respect that. I don't recall any Labour politician or party member coming forward to contest their recent leadership contest on the basis that Scotland should be independent. Victor Clements. Mamie's Cottage, Aberfeldy. Glowing picture of the old days Sir, - When I read Andrew Arbuckle's piece ''Sad to lose this local link'' (August 6), I was reminded of an article in the Holyrood Magazine which expressed similar sentiment around the time of the move towards multi-member constituencies. It painted a glowing picture of the days when, ''it was possible to bump into the Provost on his way to and from the town hall, or to drop in to see the burgh engineer about a hole in the road, there was a sense of communal ownership of local democracy. ''Local rows might become more intense and local feelings might run high about minor issues on such a row, but the upside was that there was a shared desire to see appropriate services provided to the highest standard'' and if it all seemed to be costing too much ''then there was the burgh treasurer to buttonhole at the paper shop or pub.'' It went on to say that it was important to ''return decision making to each community. That means putting into the hands of ordinary people control of the place in which they live and giving them the means to hold to account those who represent them. So 'back to the burghs' it must be.'' The author of this piece? None other than Mike Russell. Yes, the same Mike Russell who went on to become a list MSP for South of Scotland with an electorate of some 500,000 and stretching from Kilmarnock to Berwickshire. As you say, Mr Russell: ''Nothing beats keeping it local!'' Ray Russell. 16 Byron Crescent, Dundee. More than just a policy mistake Sir, - Dr Gordon Hughes, Professor of Economics at Edinburgh University, has assessed the likely impact of wind power on household energy bills. He told the House of Commons Energy Committee that meeting our renewable energy generation targets would increase households' electricity bills by around 60% by 2020. The necessary investment in windfarms would amount to about £125 billion while the same electricity demand could be met from gas plants for a capital cost of £15 billion. According to Hughes: ''The average household electricity bill would increase from some £500 per year at 2010 prices to around £800 in 2020 if we rely on wind power.'' This huge investment in an expensive and inflexible technology that is not even very green will be worse than a simple policy mistake - it will be a major economic blunder Dr John Cameron, 10 Howard Place, St Andrews. Root our rogue cars overnight Sir, - Clark Cross (Letters, August 2, ''Who pays for travellers? We do, of course'') suggests as a solution to illegal camping a visit from HM Revenue and Customs inquiring about tax payments and vehicle registrations. As far as cars are concerned, I have suggested for years that the police could profitably introduce overnight checks on our streets. They now have access to databases listing which cars are licensed, insured and have a current MOT certificate. Such checks could winkle out all the tax and insurance dodgers and illegally-run cars could be either towed away at once or dealt with when the owners arrive to drive them away in the morning. The benefits would be enormous. Thousands and thousands of pounds in lost revenue recovered, side-streets cleared of illegally-run cars, traffic congestion relieved because of the absence of these pirate vehicles and, most important of all, the great improvement in road safety with unroadworthy vehicles (as so many of them are!) removed. Another plus would be that the travellers would not feel that they alone were being victimised! George K McMillan. 5 Mount Tabor Avenue, Perth. Meteor not the only jet Sir - Reference your article ''Aircraft will mark royal milestone'' (August 8), the Meteor was the only allied jet fighter to see combat in the Second World War. The Germans, of course, had several jet aircraft in service, or on trials, during the conflict. A. T. Geddie. 68 Carleton Avenue, Glenrothes.
The Scottish Government has introduced new legislation aimed at protecting Holyrood’s powers from the “unfolding disaster of Brexit” – despite the Presiding Officer ruling the Bill is not legislatively competent.Ken Macintosh said after “careful reflection” he had come to the conclusion the Continuity Bill “would not be within the legislative competence of the Parliament”.It is the first time Scottish ministers have brought forward a bill the Presiding Officer has ruled to be outside Parliament’s legislative competence.Brexit Minister Mike Russell said he regretted the need to introduce the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill – but insisted it was “essential preparation” for leaving the European Union.It will be rushed through Holyrood on an emergency timetable – with Mr Russell saying it would be for MSPs as a whole to decide if the Bill should pass.He stated: “All MSPs can listen to the arguments and then collectively we can all decide if this Bill should become law.“It will be a decision not of the Scottish Government but of this, our national Parliament, and that is how it should be and that is why we are bringing forward this Bill.”It comes as talks between London and the devolved administrations over the UK Government’s European Union (Withdrawal) Bill remain deadlocked – with both Scotland and Wales branding the proposals a “power grab” which would undermine devolution.Mr Russell said: “Article 50 has been triggered, without a drastic change of circumstances, which many of us still hope for, regrettably it is more than likely that the UK is leaving the EU. This Bill is a necessary response to that fact.“This is the first time since the reconvening of the Scottish Parliament in 1999 that the government has introduced a bill and the Presiding Officer has not been satisfied as to the legislative competence.“We recognise that, we are mindful of what a serious moment it is.”But he said Scotland’s top law officer, Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC, was “satisfied that the Bill is within the legislative competence of the Parliament”.Mr Russell added: “The Presiding Officer’s statement on legislative competence does not in any circumstance prevent the Scottish Government from introducing or progressing any bill.“By triggering Article 50 the UK Government has put the UK on a path which leads of the European Union. As I have set out we have a duty to protect and preserve those areas of EU law that are within the responsibility of this Parliament.”The dispute with the UK Government centres over where powers should go when they return from Brussels, with SNP ministers saying all devolved powers currently exercised there should come straight to Holyrood.Westminster however argue responsibility for some areas must go to London first, to allow common frameworks to be set up across the UK.Conservative constitution spokesman Adam Tomkins described the Scottish Government’s decision to bring forward the Bill as “unwelcome and unnecessary”.The Tory MSP said: “Up until now there has been a constructive approach from both the UK and Scottish governments.“The fix to make this process fit for purpose is within reach. But the SNP must now reflect on whether this move will help or hinder the process.”But Labour’s Brexit spokesman Neil Findlay blamed Scottish Secretary David Mundell and Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson for the latest developments, saying the Tories had failed “to deliver on commitments given to resolve issues around the devolution of powers coming from the EU”.Scottish Greens co-convener Patrick Harvie said: “The introduction of this bill is an absolutely necessary response to the Brexit crisis and to its incompetent mishandling by a UK Government.”Lib Dem Tavish Scott said the failure to reach agreement on the EU Withdrawal Bill was “not good”.“It is also not satisfactory that we have no legal agreement on this Continuity Bill,” he added.Mr Mundell said: “We have been clear that we will protect and enhance the devolution settlement as we leave the EU, and that there will be a significant increase in Holyrood’s decision-making powers.“But it is crucial we protect the UK’s valuable common market, and to do so we will need common approaches across the UK in some areas.“We have made a considerable offer to the devolved administrations on amending the EU (Withdrawal) Bill, and look forward to further constructive talks.”