Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Barrier to building firms’ bid for public-sector work

Post Thumbnail

Scottish building firms are shunning public-sector work because the bidding process is too expensive to make winning the contract worthwhile.

New research has revealed it costs Scottish building firms nearly £100 million a year just to bid for public-sector contracts, which are worth around £2 billion a year.

The survey, by the Scottish Building Federation, found the cost of bidding for these contracts has risen so much over the past five years it is beginning to deter some firms from competing for them.

SBF managing director Vaughan Hart said: “Even at the best of times, construction is not a high-margin industry.

“If you consider that the cost of tendering for public-sector contracts is now more than 4% of contract value, most contractors will be fulfilling these contracts at best at break-even and at worst at a financial loss.

“With budgets as tight as they now are, public authorities are sharper than ever before on price. I know a number of contractors are actively avoiding the public- sector market because they feel they’d have to make suicidal bids to secure the work.”

Based on feedback from its members, the SBF estimates it costs a firm £1,000 for every £1m a contract is worth to complete a pre-qualification questionnaire.

Even after completing the questionnaires, which are usually more than 40 pages long, there are usually at least seven other bidders they will be competing against although there are often more.

If they make the final shortlist it costs them even more to complete the procurement process: around £3,700 per £1m of contracted value.

Mr Hart said: “The solution must be to introduce a financial incentive for public authorities to run a more efficient and cost-effective tender process.

“They should be encouraged to consider a means of reducing the tender costs to shortlisted contractors or reduce the amount of shortlisted companies in the first instance.

“Consistent enforcement of the standard pre-qualification questionnaire would help to reduce public procurement costs further.”

Mr Hart concluded: “Recovery in the private sector remains very slow, and construction firms are more dependent than ever on the public sector for a reliable long-term pipeline of work.

“That being the case, action is urgently needed to ensure that public procurement is internally efficient.

“Otherwise, the substantial costs of procurement to building contractors will continue to impede industry recovery,” he added.