Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife mum sued by house builder over Facebook comments about property row

Niki Caira at her home.
Niki Caira at her home.

A Fife mum is being sued over comments she made on Facebook about new build houses being erected within touching distance of her family home.

Solicitors for KJJ Properties and businessman Alex Penman have accused Niki Caira of “defamatory statements and innuendo” in relation to remarks made regarding the planning application to Fife Council for two £350,000 pads next to her house in Kirkcaldy.

The case will be heard in court next Tuesday.

She and husband Mario have been critical of the decision to allow the development – which Fife Council says meets their criteria – to be built.

To draw attention to her cause, Ms Caira has shared images and videos of the building works on Facebook, as well as expressing her frustration about the situation.

Asked to delete Facebook comments

Last Wednesday, sheriff officers arrived at her house in Low Road, Thornton, with letters from Robert F MacDonald Solicitors representing KJJ Properties and Mr Penman.

The correspondence read: “The allegations you make are extremely serious. We require you to retract these allegations immediately.

Niki Caira has also hung up a banner on her home to protest the new builds.
Top: An artist’s impression of the new build compared with the reality.

“The relevant Facebook posts referencing these allegations should be deleted. We would expect a written apology to be immediately forthcoming.

“Finally we require an undertaking from you that you will not repeat any of these allegations or make any similar allegations.”

Ms Caira addressed the letters on Facebook, asking others not to leave any comments of similar nature on her page.

But on Saturday the sheriff officers returned, this time with letters notifying her she was being taken to court.

Fife property row going to court

Mr Penman is suing the mum-of-seven for £75,000 over “defamatory statements” made on her Facebook page.

He claims to have suffered loss, injury and damage through “being defamed by the defender”.

The beauty business owner is on the hunt for a lawyer – but she fears nobody in Fife will want to represent her because of the nature of the case.

Niki Caira runs a business from her home offering beauty treatments.

Ms Caira added: “I’m fighting for my home and now I’m getting taken to court for a comment on Facebook.

“Look at what’s going on in our world at the moment – the government’s falling to bits, we’re still trying to deal with Covid and I’m being taken to court over a comment I made on a Facebook post.”

Robert F MacDonald Solicitors declined to respond when approached by The Courier.

Builder ‘complied with relevant requirements’

Last week in a statement given to the Daily Record, they addressed the fallout from the property dispute.

They said: “We understand that development on adjoining land can cause feelings among neighbours to run high, however my clients are satisfied that they have complied with all the relevant planning and building control requirements in respect of the two properties which are currently being erected at this site.

“This is a former brown field site which had lain empty for many years.

“Mr and Mrs Caira had the opportunity to take part in the planning process and they expressed their views to the planning authority at that time.

“No doubt these were taken into account by the Fife Council in reaching their decision.

“Mr and Mrs Caira did have the opportunity to appeal the planning decision but did not do so.

“Slightly unusually, Mr and Ms Caria’s property is built directly on the boundary between the two pieces of land.

“All the building work however has been conducted by my clients on ground owned by Mr Penman.

“There is sufficient room between the two houses for the scaffolding to be erected, and for access to repairs to either property in future if required.

Picture shows how close properties are.
Caira family are angry about handling of the situation.

“We understand that during the course of the scaffolding being erected the scaffolders asked Ms Caira if a window (which opens over land belonging to our client) could be closed slightly to enable them to erect the scaffolding.

“The existence of the scaffolding does not prevent Ms Caira from opening her window.

“Once the work has been completed there will be a 1.3 metre gap between the walls of the new build and Mr and Mrs Caira’s house, which of course exceeds the statutory minimum.”