Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Players reject plans to cope with Montrose Golf Links erosion

The erosion at Montrose threatens the golf course's long-term future.
The erosion at Montrose threatens the golf course's long-term future.

Plans to realign the world’s fifth oldest golf course to stop it from falling into the sea have been put on hold due to objections from golfers.

Montrose Golf Links had proposed changes to the famous medal course in response to coastal erosion.

Last month a decision was taken that ladies tees at the second hole were no longer be useable.

However, the plans, which would have changed the layout of seven holes, were rejected by the three clubs which use the course as well as season ticket holders.

Some felt the erosion problem was so great the plans would only be a
temporary solution.

There was also dissent over extending the sixth hole from 510 to 600 yards, which many felt was too long.

Claire Penman, secretary of Montrose Golf Links, said there will be no more work until an in-depth survey by Angus Council is evaluated.

Meanwhile, erosion continues to chip away at the historic course.

She said: “The problem is we’ve lost quite a bit more ground at the second tee and in the area of the third hole.

“We had meetings with season ticket holders and the clubs had input into the plans.

“The information that came back is that they didn’t agree with what was being suggested.

“We’ve got to listen to the members’ views.”

She said one concern was that erosion was happening so quickly, by the time the work was complete, more would be needed.

The proposal included extending three holes in length and reducing four holes in length with longer-term plans to create two new holes.
Past captain Chris Curnin, from Royal Montrose Golf Club, said: “With the
current rate of erosion it was felt the realignment would not give the course a long-term future.

“It would only extend its life by 10 years or so and would be too expensive for such a short term.

“They felt the course wasn’t just being changed for realignment. They felt it was also being altered and lengthened beyond what was necessary.

“The overall view of the members was that they wanted to protect the great course we have by using an engineering solution.”

Mr Curnin added that the club was looking to set up a stakeholders forum to look at the best way forward, which would include interested parties such as the golf clubs, port, Angus Council, erosion experts as well as the general public.

He added: “At present lots of different parties with different agendas are
pulling in different directions which is not helpful and I’m sure with some thoughtful discussions a suitable solution for all parties could be found.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in