Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

READERS’ LETTERS: The BBC coverage is hardly impartial

The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby
The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby

Sir, – Jenny Hjul (“We must all watch the BBC”, The Courier, January 10) is right to tell us to watch the BBC, but the corporation seems to have recently changed its name to Believers Broadcasting Christianity.

In December the BBC broadcast an entire Radio 4 Today programme from Lambeth Palace, the Church of England headquarters.

It gave an hour of unchallenged airtime to the Archbishop of Canterbury and others to proselytise, over and above the usual Thought for the Day slot it reserves for the religious guardians of our morality.

Your readers may have noticed that the Church of England is currently the subject of an ongoing Government-sponsored public inquiry into the cover-up of child abuse by its clergy, and indeed by some of Justin Welby’s fellow bishops.

No fewer than five current or former bishops, including the current Archbishop of Canterbury and two of his predecessors, are either directly implicated in a cover-up of child sex abuse, are under active police investigation for this grave offence, or have been exposed as having done so.

Since when did it become the policy of the national ‘state broadcaster’ to give a fellow pillar of the establishment the airtime to redeem its damaged reputation during a public inquiry into its activities?

Has the BBC learned nothing from the Savile scandal?

Alistair McBay, National Secular Society, 5 Atholl Crescent, Edinburgh.

 

Fight plastics with the truth

Sir, – In your article (“Environmentalists back bid to ban plastic straws”, The Courier, January 9) SNP MSP Kate Forbes is quoted as saying in Scotland we may consume £3 billion of plastic straws in a year, at a rate of 1.6 straws per person per day.

A very quick calculation reveals, based on a population of 5,373 million, a cost to each person of 95 pence.

Do plastic straws cost 95p each???

If politicians want to be taken seriously, then they must produce realistic statistics, and not just throw out scaremongering figures which will certainly not attract the public’s attention.

We do have a serious problem; we are a disposable society and we must all take responsibility for our actions.

Scaremongering is not the way.

Allan Smith, 8 Reed Crescent, Laurencekirk.

 

Fire rules there for a reason

Sir, – May I through your letters page thank the retained firemen of Tayport and St Andrews for the splendid way they dealt with a fire in our home on Monday January 8?

Not only were they professional in the way they dealt with the fire, but in the way they reassured my husband and myself.

Can I also take this opportunity to remind residents in streets and cul-de-sacs to be mindful of how they park their cars, as every moment counts when fire engines are trying to get to the fire they have been called out to deal with?

Carroll Finnie, 17 St Bunyans Place, Leuchars.

 

Nuclear veterans’ plight

Sir, – Reading the article “More than a war of words” (The Courier, January 11) does not fully explain the reality.

We have some of the finest men and women in the forces. They are loyal, devoted and honest.

This cannot be said of the Ministry of Defence, who use our service personnel as human guinea pigs then deny all knowledge of any problems that may occur later.

The nuclear veterans who were exposed to ionizing radiation during the war have been fighting for 60 years to have the truth divulged.

The Ministry of Defence refuses to release information regarding the levels of radiation they were forced to endure.

Documents have been requested, but the Ministry of Defence refuses to release them.

When Gordon Brown was Prime Minister he apologised for ‘slavery’ but refused to answer the three letters which I sent to him regarding the plight of the nuclear veterans.

I say, let those working at the Ministry of Defence join the armed forces.

Dave Whyte, 73 Blackcraigs, Kirkcaldy.

 

Gaelic police signage?

Sir, – A police source has told me there is a plan to mark police cars in Gaelic and a general policy to increase the use of Gaelic within Police Scotland.

While it may well make sense in those parts of Scotland where Gaelic is spoken, could Police Scotland please confirm that no money is to be wasted spending on Gaelic in parts of Scotland where it would not be understood?

Garry Barnett, Campsie Hill, Guildtown, Perth .

 

East Neuk road closure chaos

Sir, – I wonder who was the brainy person in Fife Council who decided to close all of the access roads to the East Neuk from north-east Fife – at the same time!

One would have thought that road repairs (presumably the reason for closure, although we don’t know) would have been undertaken sequentially.

Currently the only way from Cupar to Elie, for example, is either through Leven or St Andrews to Anstruther proceeding east or west on the coastal “tourist trail”.

The traffic detour signs are non-informative.

The extent of individual road closure is not given – is it one mile or 10 ? – and there are no indications of minor road links to closed roads.

The situation is bad enough for us East Neuk locals, marooned on the coast, but must be hell for non-local drivers relying on sat-navs!

For such a significant road closure programme, surely the council or its contractors could have used local media to provide better information in advance of roads being closed?

Derek Farmer, Knightsward Farm, Anstruther.

 

How to solve the NHS crisis

Sir, – Ian Allan’s frustration (Letters, January 10)over the crisis in the NHS and in particular accident and emergency (A/E)departments is understandable, but I fear that some of his analysis of the cause and its solution may be off the mark.

It does raise the question though of why, after over half a century of “free” NHS care, we seem to have a growing burden of disease and illness in our population and not less; which surely contributes to why the resources (which are considerable) increasingly struggle to cope with the demands laid on the service.

The solution of giving more sticking plasters (GP’s working all hours) is a temporary and expensive fix, when we should be reducing the need for the plasters.

Health education, better lifestyle choices and self-management of minor illness is also needed, but it might take a generation to reap benefits.

In addition, more residential care facilities would relieve pressure on hospital beds.

If GPs were to work all hours and holidays, I doubt that it would solve all of A&E’s problems.

GPs don’t work in isolation.

They would need to be assisted by practice nurses, as well as attendant receptionists and pharmacists.

They would also need access to hospital consultants, radiology and laboratory services (backed by specimen collection), and public transport for patients.

To provide this level of service would require far more than the 800 GPs (and said services) already proposed by our politicians to ease the NHS crisis.

I shudder to think how this could be funded.

It is a worrying situation, but I don’t think that simply asking an already overworked group of medical professionals to work even harder is going to help in the long run.

Whatever the answer to this predicament is, it is not going to be an easy one.

Alistair Montgomery, 8 Beechwood Terrace, Dundee.