Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scotland ‘must act now’ if it is to influence farming strategy

Animal health and welfare, low carbon economies and precision farming could be wound back into subsidy payments
Animal health and welfare, low carbon economies and precision farming could be wound back into subsidy payments

One of Scotland’s leading scientists believes time is short for influencing the UK Government on future farm policy.

According to Professor Julie Fitzpatrick, the scientific director of the Moredun Institute, agricultural strategy is already being decided in London, and Scotland needs to get involved quickly if outcomes are going to be influenced.

“I have been at meetings recently in London where it is clear agricultural strategy is being written and it will be interesting to see how much discussion there is round that,” she told a press conference in Edinburgh.

“We want to make sure the Scottish perspective is put in front of the UK as these policies are being written.”

 

 

Prof Fitzpatrick said she had not yet been formally asked by the Scottish Government to be involved in discussions but was aware of moves to set up panels. And she made it clear that she believed the direction of Scottish farm policy should have science at its heart.

“This is an opportunity like no other before to show how science led policy decision making takes place, not policy led science. It has been the wrong way round in the past. We would like to see health and welfare, low carbon economies and precision farming being in some way wound back into subsidy payments,” she said.

“In the past it was about pillar one and pillar two and subsidy payments. What we would like to see is sustainable agricultural production taken into account. That would mean you were in receipt of subsidies for doing farming better, so it might be litres of milk per unit of nitrogen applied to pasture or the number of beef calves reared per 100 suckler cows.”

Prof Fitzpatrick emphasised that the Moredun’s views were being discussed with  with other research institutes and stakeholders such as NFU Scotland.

She added: “When Brexit happened everyone looked at the downside, but  a more focused agricultural policy on the needs of UK farmers is an attractive one. There are differences between Scotland and the rest of the UK, but wouldn’t it be fantastic if you got a really good UK strategy and then within that you had the capacity to make regional ad geographical priorities and that might help ease farmers eventually on a trajectory where there is less reliance on subsidies and more reliance on farm productivity and profitability.”

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk