Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Funding limitations ‘holding Dundee barley hub back’

Backing for the project can not be sourced directly from central government scientific research funds
Backing for the project can not be sourced directly from central government scientific research funds

The team behind the plan to build an International Barley Hub in Dundee expects to hear within days if the £68million project will be included in the Tay Cities Deal proposal.

The business case for a £40million contribution to the project was made on January 13 and at an industry meeting at Invergowrie, project chairman Colin West said he was encouraged by the initial response to the plan.

“We can read the tea leaves and we’re optimistic,” he said.

However Professor Robbie Waugh, the leader of the barley group at the James Hutton Institute (JHI) – where the hub would be sited – voiced his frustration that backing for the project could not be sourced directly from central government scientific research funds.

Because the Scottish Government owns the JHI site and funds some of the work done there, the institute is barred from applying for central government money. Prof Waugh pointed to huge levels of investment currently being made at other scientific centres and said Dundee was missing out.

“If we look at scientifically competing institutions – Norwich, for instance – in the last three years they’ve had a £26m investment for an innovation hub for research; they’re building a brand new Quadrum Institute with a budget of £80 million and they’re getting another £80 million to refurbish the John Innes Centre,” he said.

“The buildings are all within 100 metres of one another, and all the money comes from central government through the research councils, but we’re not eligible for it. So we’re trying to scratch around and get £40 million through industry support and the Tay Cities Deal, whereas the research councils are recognising the value of what other people do, and they invest.

“It’s a lack of recognition of the value of the work that goes on in places like this in the longer term to big industries that generate revenue.”

He added: “Scientifically we’re being asked to compete on the world stage with everyone else but we can’t get the funding to do what we want to do as well as we can do it because we’re not eligible.”

Prof Waugh said the funding that was required for the hub amounted to just 1% of the revenue from Scottish whisky in one year.

“That would fund a building that will underpin that business for probably the next 50 years,” he said.

“ One percent – it’s nothing. And that’s not including the beer industry or food barley or the feed barley industries.”

Prof Waugh argued that Brexit would also pose challenges for the proposed hub and other scientific work.

He said: “It may restrict our ability to interact with close colleagues in other European countries, because we get joint funding and we talk about what we’re doing. As soon as the funding becomes partitioned to individual countries we’ll start to compete.

“It’s inevitable. It’s crazy.”

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk