Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alliance Trust fund management changes get green light

Alliance Trust's headquarters on West Marketgait. Dundee
Alliance Trust's headquarters on West Marketgait. Dundee

Alliance Trust has entered a “new chapter” after shareholders approved an historic switch to an outsourced fund management model and waved goodbye to activist investor Elliot.

Around 100 investors gathered in Edinburgh for a general meeting to approve a board recommended move to adopt a new multi-manager regime overseen by global investment advisor Willis Towers Watson (WTW).

Shareholders also gave their approval to the Dundee-based Trust buying out rebel activist Elliott’s near 20% holding in the company.

The move will cost in the region of £620 million and be completed in a series of transactions in the coming weeks.

It is expected that Elliott – who had representatives at the meeting – will be off the roster by the time the company holds its AGM in Dundee on April 27.

The group first took a position with the Trust before Laxey Partner’s made its aborted bid to force change within the company some years ago.

It continued to grow its shareholding and eventually became the Trust’s largest single shareholder, holding 19.75% at the point of exit.

Elliott itself raised concerns about the Trust’s governance and performance and its profile rocketed ahead of the 2015 general meeting when it put forward proposals for boardroom change.

The Trust – then led by chief executive Katherine Garrett-Cox and chairman Karin Forseke – spent £3 million defending its position, but the battle was ultimately lost and two Elliott nominees were eventually co-opted on to the board.

Within months, the former management team had left and veteran businessman Lord Smith of  Kelvin was drafted in as new chairman.

Alliance Trust chairman Lord Smith of Kelvin
Alliance Trust chairman Lord Smith of Kelvin

He promised change to investors at the Trust’s 2016 AGM and a consultation was held over several months last year into the future direction of the company.

That led to December’s announcement of the Trust’s intention to work with WTW as part of a new multi-manager model, with improved performance targets of 2% outperformance over its peers.

The move was controversial due to WTW’s involvement at an early stage in the Trust’s consultation process.

The Trust previously stated publicly its belief that there was no conflict of interest in WTW’s proposed appointment – a point Lord Smith was forced to reiterate at the general meeting today when the situation was raised by shareholders.

Around a dozen questions were taken from the floor during the hour-long session at the Edinburgh International Conference Centre, with shareholders also querying how funds will be raised to buy-out Elliott and the likely effect on the company’s discount to net asset value as a result of the changes being made.

Deputy chairman Gregor Stewart sought to alleviate concerns about the Elliott buy back, stating it would result in a “solid and supportive share register” going forward.

He added the wider changes would give the Trust a “fresh start” from which to build.

“The board believes the repurchase is in the best interest of all shareholders and will provide an immediate uplift of approximately 1% continuing shareholders,” Mr Stewart said.

All four resolutions put to shareholders at the meeting – including two special resolutions that required a 75% majority in favour – were duly passed.