Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MARK GIBSON: Reassessing farm business can be a tax gain

Mark Gibson, a partner with Thomson Cooper Accountants.
Mark Gibson, a partner with Thomson Cooper Accountants.

Farmers tend not to think of themselves as estate owners, however, thanks to diversification, there are striking similarities.

Many in the accounting profession who act for farmers are aware that HMRC is pushing hard to assess farming businesses with diverse activities as investment rather than trading. This distinction relates to inheritance tax and the protection of Business Property Relief (BPR).

While qualifying farming assets qualify for 100% inheritance tax relief through agricultural property relief, diversified businesses now also rely on BPR, which allows for relief at 100% on those non-farming assets such as holiday lets, renewable energy generation, rented cottages etc.

To qualify for BPR, the underlying business has to be one of trading. The Balfour 2009 vs HMRC case created a framework on which to assess farming activity in terms of turnover, profitability, capital values and time spent between trading and non-trading assets.

Addressing these four points, it can easily be argued that in most diversified activities the turnover, capital value and time spent elements would not exceed those of the original farming business. Therefore, farmers are able to tick those boxes.

However, many farmers will find the non-trading or investment element of their business will contribute to more than 50% of the business profit.

Take, for example, a farming businesses involved in agritourism. In addition to the farm, it offers glamping or holiday letting.

Without careful consideration, this “trade” may be deemed to be investment and if it contributes to more than 50% of the profitability of the overall business then HMRC could argue that the farmer is simply renting property, hence investment, and they could lose BPR.

Current recommendations by the Office of Tax Simplification to the Chancellor have indicated that Business Property Relief should be harder to achieve.

The action plan is simple; reassess the farm business. Is it the same as it was 20 years ago?

If the answer is no, then we encourage farmers to address structure, and document time spent in the various aspects of their business estate.

Mark Gibson is a partner with Thomson Cooper Accountants.