Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Farmers call for ‘dual’ approach to measuring emissions from livestock

Commercial Farmers Group wants two methods to be used when measuring emissions from the livestock sector.
Commercial Farmers Group wants two methods to be used when measuring emissions from the livestock sector.

A group of farmers has called on governments across the UK to adopt a dual approach to measuring emissions from livestock and a voluntary cap on cattle and sheep numbers.

A report from the Commercial Farmers Group (CFG) – a group of farmers working to promote a resilient UK agriculture industry – calls for two different models to be used side-by-side when measuring greenhouse gas emissions from cattle and sheep enterprises.

The report calls for the commonly used GWP100 accounting method and the GWP* method to be used in tandem – an approach already used to measure emissions from livestock in New Zealand.

In its report, CFG also proposes a UK-wide voluntary cap on livestock numbers – on a national herd and flock basis, rather than individual farm basis – if GWP* is adopted.

CFG member Andrew Loftus, who farms in Yorkshire, said the GWP100 method offers a reliable way of measuring gases that last hundreds or thousands of years in the earth’s atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, however it does not work for “biogenic” methane from ruminant livestock.

Commercial Farmers Group director and Yorkshire farmer Andrew Loftus.

He said CFG wants the measure used alongside GWP* – a method developed by scientists at the Oxford Martin School at the University of Oxford, to measure the “true warming impact” of individual gases, such as methane.

The CFG report claims any reductions in methane output from cattle and sheep could provide a “cooling effect”, similar to tree planting.

It says adopting the GWP technique would not let the ruminant sectors rest easy because, for example, any increase in livestock numbers without methane mitigation measures would be recognised as causing significant warming of the climate.

Mr Loftus said failure to adopt an accurate method for measuring methane from livestock would hinder the farming sector’s ability to ascertain the success of any climate change mitigation measures.

These include changes to feed or the use of supplements, selective breeding, improved animal health, and better manure management.

He called on politicians to adopt this dual approach to measuring emissions from livestock ahead of the UK hosting the G7 summit in Cornwall in June and the COP26 climate event in Glasgow in November.

“Accurate measurement would unlock new technologies to mitigate [climate] warming and balance high quality, home-grown protein production with the complexities of optimising land use and reinstating biodiversity,” added Mr Loftus.

“It would show tremendous leadership if the UK became the first G7 country to implement dual accounting.”