Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

RAB DOUGLAS: SPFL have chosen the wrong type of reconstruction taskforce

Gordon Strachan.
Gordon Strachan.

I think Ann Budge will regret being as open as she was with her reconstruction thoughts a while ago.

When she talked about changing the league set-up temporarily, you didn’t have to read between the lines to see that her view of the future was shaped by what is best for Hearts.

You can’t blame her for that.

Every chairperson and chief executive at every club has to put their own business first. It’s only natural.

But it undermines her position at the head of the SPFL reconstruction taskforce – probably fatally.

I’m not a hard-line opponent of making changes but they have to be for the long-term benefit of Scottish football, not for the short-term benefit of Hearts, or any other individual club for that matter.

I think the SPFL have gone about this the wrong way.

For a start, a 15-person panel is far too big.

And the composition is wrong as well. It’s men and women who are in charge of the running of their clubs. Where’s the variety?

Again, they will speak about the general good of the game, and will probably want to achieve something that does help Scottish football as a whole, but the number one priority will be their own teams.

We need to break free from that.

That’s what we got with the first SPFL vote and that’s what we’ll get with this taskforce.

Four people from different backgrounds would be the way I’d have gone.

You could have somebody like Gordon Strachan or Craig Brown, perhaps an ex-administrator like Roger Mitchell, a players’ representative put forward by the SPFA and a lawyer.

That would cover all the bases and cut down the competing voices.

I can’t see football restarting until September at the earliest.

That gives us the chance to take our time and be bold. There’s no need to rush now that the lower league clubs have been given their prize money.

Maybe we would end up with regional divisions – I can certainly see a strong argument for it.

We had a midweek game at Ayr this season when a combination of the weather and the traffic meant we missed our pre-match meal and were rushing to get ready for kick-off.

Nights like that make you think that there has to be a better way.

And if we had the type of taskforce I’m suggesting, I’d be pretty confident that we’d come up with one.

 

* Brechin are clearly one of the biggest beneficiaries of the decision to cancel the lower leagues.

It wasn’t mathematically certain, but there was little doubt they were heading for the pyramid play-off and all the pressure that brings.

But anybody suggesting that because their chairman, Ken Ferguson, is on the SPFL board means he’s been able to shape things to help his own club are barking up the wrong tree.

Do you really think that the big clubs who have the biggest influence on the board would make Brechin’s SPFL status their priority? Not a chance.

One of my first games at Meadowbank was at Glebe Park so I’ll always have a soft spot for a club that has only got itself into trouble relatively recently.

Hopefully now they’ll take advantage of their good fortune and make sure they never get close to the trapdoor again.