Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Council clears controversial £74m Perth leisure plan of any equality issues despite concerns

The findings of the unsigned document are in contrast to details put forward by campaigners.

Residents and sports teams Say No to Thimblerow leisure plans. Image: Richard Wilkins
Residents and sports teams Say No to Thimblerow leisure plans. Image: Richard Wilkins

An equality report by council officers found zero negative impacts in the controversial plans for a new Perth leisure centre at Thimblerow.

The findings of the in-house report are in contrast to deputations made by sports groups who have spoken of the detrimental affect the proposals will have on the elderly and sports players with disabilities.

The Equality and Fairness Impact Assessment (EIFA) is a legally required document to ensure that those with protected characteristics – such as older people and people with disabilities – are not discriminated against.

Three people with 'Save Bells' placards and badminton raquets outside Perth and Kinross Council HQ.
Gareth Thomas, Eileen Thomas and Innes Penman protested ahead of the council vote on Perth’s new PH2O pool and leisure complex. Image: Steve MacDougall/DC Thomson

In Perth and Kinross Council’s report, the space dedicated for outlining possible negative impacts has been left blank.

The local authority say they will retrospectively engage with groups in the design stage to meet requirements.

However, that is after the decision to build the the new £74m complex at Thimblerow and turn Bell’s Sports Centre into an unheated events space has already been taken.

The document is also unsigned by either of the two required signatures, a service manager and a quality assured EIFA trained officer.

The local authority say this is an admin error.

A litany of questions on assessments

A number of questions have already been raised over assessments and consultations carried out by the local authority and LAL over Thimblerow and Bell’s Sports Centre.

An EIFA conducted by LAL last year found mostly negative outcomes for protected people in the closure of Bell’s, which was axed months later.

In that report, leisure bosses failed to conduct any of the required consultations and ignored advice from their own independent consultants to do so.

Perth and Kinross council chief executive Thomas Glen. Image: Steve MacDougall/DC Thomson

The Courier has revealed that there was no health and wellbeing impact assessments carried out by the local authority with regards to the new leisure complex, as admitted by chief executive Thomas Glen.

No economic impact assessment for the loss of Thimblerow car park has been conducted either.

One of the few public consultations held by council asked if Bell’s should be turned into an unheated venue, this has been heavily criticised as flawed and misleading.

What the council are saying

The local authority say the EIFA is reflective of the Thimblerow leisure centre report presented to councillors on Wednesday.

A spokesperson for Perth and Kinross Council said: “We are now moving into the detailed design phase and, as noted in the EFIA, engagement with groups representing those with protected characteristics will be undertaken as part of this process to ensure the new facilities agreed by council are accessible and achieve their intended positive impacts.

“The council’s equalities team leader will also be part of the project design team and will liaise with local groups throughout.

“The uploaded EFIA was authorised before submission, but the version of the document showing authorisation was not the one uploaded.

“This was an oversight and is being corrected.”

Conversation