Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Angus Council enacted snooper legislation three times in a year

Post Thumbnail

Council chiefs have been urged to ensure they use their powers sparingly after it was revealed Angus authorised the use of surveillance legislation three times in the last year.

It comes after a meeting of Angus Council’s policy and resources committee in Forfar heard that four kinds of council officer can conduct surveillance activities.

These include environmental health officers investigating the standards of cleanliness in a commercial restaurant, community safety officers investigating complaints of anti-social behaviour, finance officers investigating fraudulent housing benefit or council tax benefit claims, and consumer protection officers covertly filming the activities of suspected dealers in counterfeit goods.

Angus has the legal power to authorise “direct covert surveillance” and “covert human intelligence sources” (CHIS) where circumstances justify it, and the committee heard operations under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Act 2000 were carried out three times between April 1 last year and March 31 this year.

Direct surveillance is used where there is a need to obtain private information about a person. CHIS covers operations where someone establishes or maintains a relationship to obtain information.

The three cases in Angus related to direct surveillance – two for community safety and the prevention and detection of antisocial behaviour, and the other related to breaches of unfair trading regulations.

A recent study by civil liberties group Big Brother Watch found the council had spent £17,870 on rolling out body cameras for its community warden service in the communities department.

It said 54% of all UK local authorities are equipping members of staff or contractors with body worn cameras at a cost of £1,791,960.81.

“Big Brother Watch is concerned that the rush to use body worn cameras by local authorities is not being scrutinised closely enough,” said a spokesman.

“Over the past eight years we have found that local authorities have used counter terrorism powers to spy on dog owners, suspected fly tippers and even members of staff they employ to spot crime.

“We have revealed the thousands of officials able to enter our homes, often without a warrant, and we have lain bare the financial burden of CCTV on council coffers.”

Liam Kerr, Scottish Conservative MSP for the North East Region, said: “While there are undoubtedly situations in which this type of surveillance can be used to good effect, councils have to be careful they do not overstep the mark.

“It can clearly be useful in terms of trading standards investigations, for example.

“Provided that the operations remain within the boundaries of what is permitted, I think most people would consider that the end can justify the means.”

Angus Council’s principal solicitor, David Thompson, asked the committee to note the local authority cannot conduct “intrusive” surveillance – in cars or residences.

“Surveillance is not intrusive if it is directed into a home or private vehicle from outside of that home or vehicle unless the information provided from the surveillance is consistently of the same quality as would be provided by having a device actually present in the home or vehicle,” he said.

“Therefore, activities such as filming goods being sold from the back of a car or monitoring the level of noise generated by an antisocial tenant, but not the actual words spoken by the tenant, are unlikely to be classed as intrusive.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in