Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Forfar church to be demolished to make way for new community centre

St Margaret's minister the Rev Maggie Hunt.
St Margaret's minister the Rev Maggie Hunt.

St Margaret’s Church in Forfar is to be demolished to make way for a new £1 million, multi-purpose community centre.

The plans were given the go-ahead yesterday at a meeting of an Angus Council development review committee.

Church members were in attendance to hear if their vision for the future would clear the final hurdle in what has been a long journey.

They were left disappointed last year after the plans were thrown out by Angus planners and rejected by officers under delegated powers on the grounds the building, which dates back to the 1880s, lay in the town’s conservation area.

They had put forward the proposals in light of refurbishment costs for the current building which totalled £1.4 million.

Review committee members were unanimous in their support of the application and  upheld the church’s appeal.

They took issue with the conservation card played by planners — citing the nearby library building, former Post Office, Bank of Scotland, AG Barr “lemonade” factory  and Ramsay Ladders’ buildings as examples of modern buildings.

An architect’s impression of the new church building.

Bill Duff, SNP councillor for Montrose and District said: “We all know the problems with large Victorian buildings – the maintenance of the property and heating problems.

“This looks like a modern development which will enhance the whole community .

“The reason it seems to have been rejected is that it is an integral part of the Forfar conservation area – but it is not listed by Historic Environment Scotland.”

David Lumgair, Conservative councillor for Arbroath West and Letham, stated the site had no historical value.

“In this day and age when, to attract people to church seems like a losing battle, these plans would make going to church a lot more attractive. I admire what they are trying to do.”

Celebrating their victory the Reverend Maggie Hunt said they would now look forward to raising the funds to build “our dream.”

“We are delighted to have our appeal upheld and to have the opportunity to move forward with our plans for a multi-purpose centre which will be for all the people of our  parish, and not just the few who currently attend Sunday worship.

“My thanks have to go to the volunteers of our project management group who have worked tirelessly  over many years to get us to this point.

“These plans have been carefully put together over some time and have involved significant work

“This is a  team celebration.

“I have only been part of this team for three years but this is their dream, their vision and this is our hope for the future — not only of our church but our community we are looking to serve.

“We want to have an accessible centre on West High Street that will provide a sports hall for people as well as a hospitality  area, meeting space and  disabled changing and toileting facilities which are not currently available up our end of town.

“It has been a bumpy ride. We were very saddened when we didn’t get the planning permission first time round because we felt that they hadn’t taken into consideration the views of the people.”

The plans had received 154 letters of support from the community, Forfar Community Council and  local business owners as well as groups which use the current building.

“We were saddened when we didn’t get it but we thought we had come this far, we would go to appeal and allow the councillors to have their voice heard.

“The original decision was taken by planning department officers and didn’t go to the council,  so this was an opportunity for the voice of the people to be heard and not just the council conservation area policy.”

Councillors upheld the appeal on the grounds any historical environmental value of the site would not be compromised and that there would be an economic and social benefit, and that it delivered a high standard of design which would provide a positive benefit to the character and development of the surrounding area.