Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Renewable energy boss ‘holds hands up’ over Carnoustie plant’s planning process

Hatton Farm
Hatton Farm

A renewable-energy boss “held his hands up” and admitted he “completely missed” planning procedures for a fourth storage tank at an anaerobic digester plant at Hatton Farm, Carnoustie.

David Olwell addressed members of Angus Council’s development standards committee in Forfar which was asked to consider three applications from the company.

The first was for an extension of the plant; the second was for the erection of an additional digestate storage tank and the third sought hazardous substances consent for the storage of 8.11 tonnes of biogas and 24 tonnes of LPG propane.

All were seeking retrospective planning permission.

The site consists of an area of arable land that extends into a former disused WW2 airfield.

It has the capacity to provide energy to power 6,000 homes and currently employs six members of staff who work on a 24/7 rota basis.

There have been no objections from SEPA or council engineers and the impact on the landscape is negligible.

Councillor David Cheape, independent councillor for Carnoustie and District, slammed the application, stating it should be judged as industrial, not agricultural diversification.

Dr Alasdair Murray, a member of East Haven together, also hit out at the developer claiming that, over a “prolonged and complex planning process” they had “lacked transparency”.

There had been no attempts to engage with tenants of properties owned by the landowner, the wider communities of Scryne and East Haven or Carnoustie Community Council, despite the council lodging an objection, he said.

He claimed the developer had adopted a “creeping expansionism approach” to the planning process which had seriously undermined the trust of surrounding communities.

The scale of the development had doubled from two to four digesters and what was originally described as farm diversification had turned into a” full scale industrial development of a rural area.”

He criticised the developer’s “apparent disregards for the concept of planning permission” adding: “It has a repeated history of applying for planning permission only after the structure has been built or put in place.

“I appreciate the financial benefits for the landowner, the operators, Scottish Gas Network and the utility companies; I see no evidence that the project will contribute to environmental improvements nor will it make a positive contribution to the rural economy of Angus.

“I ask for the applications be held up for full public scrutiny.”

Speaking on behalf of the applicants Grissan Energy Services Limited, Mr Olwell stated the planning application to extend the site was for operational reasons.

It would allow feed stock to be stored in different clamps for the sustainability of the site and the renewable gas produce.

He said of the fourth tank: “We have to hold our hands up on that one and say we completely missed it and that is why we have a retrospective planning permission application.”

“All our drawings had four tanks on them so we kind of let it slip, but as soon as we realised we went through the proper channels and made an application to have it installed on site.”

All three applications were granted retrospective planning permission.

Already a subscriber? Sign in