Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Petrol wars amid claims new Angus petrol station would “be detrimental to existing local services”

Site of planned filling station, drive-through and retail unit for Orchardbank Business Park at Forfar.
Site of planned filling station, drive-through and retail unit for Orchardbank Business Park at Forfar.

Petrol wars have broken out in Angus ahead of a crucial vote on a new filling station.

The application by EG Group for a petrol station, retail unit, restaurant and drive-through at Forfar’s Orchardbank business park has been listed for determination by Angus Council’s development standards committee on August 7.

Stracathro Service Area owner Pat Melville-Evans has objected and claimed the application – which would be 13.5 miles away from her filling station – is against planning policy.

She also raised road safety concerns and claimed the petrol station would “result in an over-supply that would be detrimental to existing local services”.

In response, the applicant said the claims were “wholly unaccepted” and they would not consider opening a filling station where their target market was saturated.

The petrol station, retail unit, restaurant and drive-through proposal could bring up to 60 jobs to the area.

If successful, it would become one of the sites owned by Blackburn-headquartered independent forecourt retailer EG Group, which is seeking to increase its operations in Scotland.

A planning agent for Mrs Melville-Evans said: “Our client strongly objects to the planning application on the grounds that the petrol station element of the proposal is not in accordance with the land use requirements set out in local planning policy; and also raises concerns in relation to accessibility and road safety.

“Furthermore, the development of a petrol filling station at this location will result in an over-supply that would be detrimental to existing local services.

“A petrol filling station at the proposal site would therefore be an eighth petrol filling station within a 15-mile radius, and the fourth in Forfar, which all cater for the limited passing trade on the A90.

“It is considered that there is no locational justification for a petrol filling station at the site which would further dilute the local market for these facilities.”

The comprehensive application includes a 504sqm retail unit, a 224sqm drive through and coffee shop, and 66 parking bays, including two charging points for electric vehicles and eleven HGV bays, and four cycle stands, with EG Group arguing that the site represents an attractive location for a petrol forecourt.

Landscaping proposals around the site include extensive woodland planting, mounding to minimise visual intrusion and assist with noise issues, and high specification shrubs, trees and hedgerow planting in the vicinity of buildings and car parking areas.

An agent for EG Group said the proposals were in accordance with local planning policy and it was “simply not the case” that safety would be compromised.

“Over-supply of petrol filling stations is not considered a valid planning argument,” she said.

“As a commercial developer the applicant has chosen to seek permission to locate in this area.

“It stands to reason by the sizeable investment in the venture yo date that the applicant would not seek to locate in an area where their target market is saturated by way of an oversupply of petrol stations.

“This argument is therefore not accepted.”