Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dundee woman deliberately burned child with an iron, jury trial hears

Chalmers is on trial at Dundee Sheriff Court
Chalmers is on trial at Dundee Sheriff Court

A court has heard a woman “deliberately” burned a child with an iron in a Dundee flat.

Coral Ann Chalmers, 22, claims the child was injured after brushing against a cooker, which had been used 45 minutes earlier.

However, a paediatric expert concluded the triangular burn sustained by the young boy was most likely to have been caused by an iron.

Chalmers denies causing the boy to suffer severe injury at an address in Dundee by burning his leg with an iron between November 28 and 30 2019.

Jurors at Dundee Sheriff Court were told how Chalmers brought the child to King’s Cross Hospital on the November 30 because she was concerned he had a cold.

The boy was later taken to Ninewells and told medics the injury “must have” been caused the previous evening.

Chalmers claimed the injury happened while she was holding the child and trying to reach for a cupboard.

The court heard how Chalmers said the cooker was still hot 45 minutes after using it.

However, a police scene examiner revealed a test found the oven would cool to around 30 degrees, 20 minutes after use.

Medical evidence

Dr Jenny Fraser assessed the child and prepared a report which concluded that the injury was “non-accidental”.

In evidence she said: “Contact would only need to be less than a second for a burn to occur.

“If it was an accidental burn it would not be symmetrical.

“Overall this injury to the thigh is consistent with an inflicted burn with a household iron.”

Fiscal depute Stewart Duncan asked: “Given the shape of the burn, it was suggested that the child had been sat on the cooker, could the injury have come from that?”

Dr Fraser replied: “If a child had been sat on top of it, it would have had a more rounded appearance.

“You would be more likely to see a burn on the buttocks.”

Child ‘backed into iron’

During cross-examination, solicitor Douglas Thomson raised the possibility of the child sustaining the injury by backing into the iron.

However, Dr Fraser did not support this theory.

“The shape of the burn fit with the pattern of the iron.

“I can never be 100% certain but I have difficulty envisioning how the iron would be set-up that the child would back into it in that manner.”

Earlier, jurors heard from Dr Katherine Lawlor who said she had “misgivings” about Chalmers’ version of events after being called out to examine the child at Ninewells.

It was claimed Chalmers told police the child “never said anything or made a noise” after coming into contact with the cooker and was later sitting on a couch and watching cartoons before being put to bed.

The trial before Sheriff Alastair Carmichael continues.