Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Tayside builder’s work was ‘totally unacceptable’, expert tells court

Dundee Sheriff Court.
Dundee Sheriff Court.

The standard of work done by an alleged bogus tradesman in Tayside was “totally unacceptable”, according to an expert witness giving evidence in court.

John Shelley, a retired quantity surveyor, took to the stand at Dundee Sheriff Court yesterday on the fourth day of the trial of Norman Hughes, who is accused of defrauding six householders out of £61,570.

Hughes, 36, of Abbey Road in Scone, denies six charges of failing to complete work and carrying out work in a “grossly negligent manner” in Dundee, Longforgan, Blairgowrie and Arbroath between 2014 and 2016.

In April 2016, while employed by Perth and Kinross Council, Mr Shelley, 68, inspected the Blairgowrie home of couple Susan and Paul Collins after a request by the police.

The trial had previously heard Ms Collins, 55, had hired the tradesman to re-slate the property’s roof and do harling work on the walls two months earlier, however she claimed she was £12,000 out of pocket because the work was “never finished”.

Mr Shelley, who has more than 40 years experience as a surveyor, was asked by the prosecution to explain in detail the technical standard of work completed.

Summarising his evidence, he said there were issues with the installation of the roof’s building paper, slates, and guttering as well as the harling.

“Everything is wrong (with the slates)”, he said.

“I was struggling to think of something there that’s right and there’s consequential damage caused as well.

“This is bigger than snagging points. Snagging is the odd cracked slate or missing screw.

“This is far more fundamental than that.

“You would need to start again to fix the slates. That means taking them all off.

“Take the original estimate (for the price) and double it. It would be around £5,500 — that’s certainly not snagging.

“It would take around a month to do. There’s quite a lot of debris to take away too.”

He was also asked by the prosecution to identify issues with the roof of Robert and Gail Ritchie’s Longforgan home, which the court earlier heard had been re-slated by Hughes in May 2016, at a cost of £8,800.

He said from looking at photographs, the slates have been put in “incorrectly” because they are “falling off, slipping or split” adding “on every elevation there are broken slates”.

“They should last a lifetime,” he added.

“I wouldn’t expect any to come off.”

The trial, presided over by Sheriff Alastair Carmichael, continues.