Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Verdict as St Andrews man’s audacious bid to overturn speeding fine goes to High Court

John Scrymgeour-Wedderburn.
John Scrymgeour-Wedderburn.

The High Court has delivered its verdict on a St Andrews businessman who made an audacious bid to avoid a speeding prosecution on the grounds the letter informing him of the offence was signed by a retired chief constable.

John Scrymgeour-Wedderburn, 64, was charged with speeding at 55mph in a 40mph zone at the Balfarg Junction near Glenrothes on April 26 last year.

After the offence was caught on camera he was sent notification of his intended prosecution bearing the digital signature of chief constable Philip Gormley.

However, the letter was dated April 27, 2018, several weeks after Mr Gormley stood down from the force’s top job on February 7.

Dr Scrymgeour-Wedderburn, who already had nine points on his licence and faced a further three, challenged the decision through the courts and although his Sheriff Appeal Court was dismissed, he pursued the issue via the High Court.

Solicitors for Dr Scrymgeour-Wedderburn maintained a notice of intended prosecution was a formal document which required to be served on an accused, suggesting the notice was invalid because it came from someone who was not entitled to give it.

However, Lord Carloway agreed with the stance of solicitors for the prosecution who argued that the defect in the signature of the chief constables was “irrelevant” to the issue of whether Dr Scrymgeour-Wedderburn has been put on notice about his driving.

In determining whether a particular document constitutes a sufficient notice, Lord Carloway concluded “a modicum of commonsense” was needed.

He ruled: “The notice of intended prosecution in this case came on notepaper headed ‘Police Scotland’ and bearing that institution’s official crest..

“There was a specific reference to the East Safety Camera Unit and to the relative website which, if consulted, would have made it even clearer that the Unit operated under the auspices of the police.

“All the requisite details of the alleged offence were given.

“The letter concluded with an electronic signature of a person who was not then the chief constable (a fact of which the appellant may, or may not, have been, aware).

“This was an error, but it was not one which affected the validity of the notice, which continued to meet the purpose of the statutory provision.

“It is not suggested that the error misled or prejudiced the appellant.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in