Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Dundee social care workers win shifts reprieve after threatening industrial action

Jim McFarlane led the fight against the proposed changes.
Jim McFarlane led the fight against the proposed changes.

Controversial plans to introduce split shifts for social care workers were booted into the long grass after a tempestuous meeting in Dundee City Chambers last night.

The policy and resources committee had proposed introducing a new shift system for social care workers, who are responsible for delivering care to some of the city’s most vulnerable people in their homes.

After two years of negotiations, the council proposed introducing a new shift system that would see staff retained on a range of contracts.

Some would work 30 hour per week, split shift contracts, while others would work a 25-hour per week with split shifts or just 23 hours a week with single shifts.

The SNP administration was left in no doubt about the opposition to the plans, which saw care workers and trade unionists pack the public gallery and line up around the City Chambers.

Council officers were even jeered when they suggested there was no evidence to support the view that split shifts have a negative impact on health.

Jim McFarlane, branch secretary of local government union UNISON, said there was widespread opposition to the changes amongst staff and accused the council of “threatening dismissal and re-engaging staff” on new contracts if they did not accept the changes.

He warned: “If you go ahead with this it has implications for every single council worker – we will ballot our members across the workforce.”

Care worker Susan Marnie added those who had to accept reduced hours could lose between £300 and £350 a month.

West End Liberal Democrat councillor Fraser Macpherson said there “was no way in God’s green Earth” he would vote for the proposal due to a lack of consultation with service users.

“It is completely unacceptable to move forward and not enter into any consultation with the service users who receive the service,” he said.

To loud cheers, he added: “That is plain wrong, wrong, wrong.”

Labour Lochee councillor Charlie Malone said the changes would destroy morale.

Although committee convener and council leader John Alexander argued they are necessary to cope with increasing demands, no other SNP member spoke in favour of the proposal.

Following a 10-minute recess, Mr Alexander proposed further consultation between the council, trade unions and service users with a report to be presented to councillors before the summer recess.

He said: “There will be more time for negotiation and more discussion. It may well come back with new options or the current options.”

There were further cheers when the committee agreed to the extended consultation.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]