Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Dundee Matters: SNP Bad? An easy answer to difficult questions

Health Secretary Jeane Freeman.
Health Secretary Jeane Freeman.

Sometime before the independence referendum in 2014, a friend asked me if newspapers were given a list of stories knocking the SNP each day.

Had I my wits about me — it was late in the evening and a sophisticated amount of drinking had occurred — I’d have said something clever, like Unionist stooge Ben Fogle sent round an email each morning after communing with the spirits of Margaret Thatcher and Butcher Cumberland.

Sadly, I came up with something much more mundane: the truth, that most reporting on the campaign trail was responsive and as the Yes campaign was putting forward the proposition that independence would be best for Scotland, its claims would, inevitably, be scrutinised by newspapers and opposition parties.

So, for example, when former First Minister Alex Salmond said Scotland would be able to declare itself an independent nation in March 2016, just 18 months after the vote, asking if this was really possible wasn’t inherent anti-SNP bias, but a legitimate response to an unsubstantiated claim.

Timescales sprang to mind again this week when SNP politicians reacted with a fair amount of wailing and gnashing of teeth when social security minister Jeane Freeman’s triumphant march into Dundee was not reported with the deference it deserved.

Six months ago First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced the headquarters of the new Scottish Social Security agency would be shared between Dundee and Glasgow, creating around 750 jobs here in the process.

This is undoubtedly good news for the city and was reported as such at the time.

Last week, Ms Freeman arrived in Dundee to announce that recruitment for the first 80 posts was about to begin.

Unfortunately when Ms Freeman was asked where these jobs would be based she was unable to give an answer, although the Scottish Government hopes to announce an “interim” location soon.

The cynical among you may wonder how the apparatus of a fully independent nation could be set up in just 18 months and yet it takes more than six to find an office — but anything is possible: it took The Stone Roses four years to record The Second Coming compared to the six months it took The Beatles to make Sergeant Pepper.

I’m no expert but I imagine setting up a social security system is probably complicated. In fact, I reckon kitting out an office for 750 people is also quite tricky. The fact the Scottish Government does not yet know where this office will be — or if it does, it isn’t saying — is more than a little noteworthy, certainly more so than the start of a recruitment process for previously announced new jobs.

It’s also of public interest: will the staff be based in offices in the controversial site six opposite the V&A or somewhere else? Are they to be in the city centre or another part of Dundee, where 750 new workers would provide an instant economic stimulus.

Nevertheless, some senior SNP politicians still buy into the theory that anything less than fawning coverage is evidence of some vast conspiracy against them.

Some proclaimed the coverage is evidence of “SNP Bad” reporting, a useful cover used on social media, like Donald Trump’s fake news, for avoiding criticism or even the reporting of facts that may not portray the party in the best light.

Put simply, the role of newspapers is not to be cheerleaders for any government or party, and politicians who demand nothing but plaudits are in the wrong game.