Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Why have only two community asset transfers in Fife been successful?

Community asset transfers Fife
Councillors are to investigate the Community Asset Transfer scheme after it was revealed just two applications were approved in five years.

An investigation is to be launched into Fife Council’s policy of selling surplus properties after it was revealed just two public organisations have been granted a buy-out since the scheme was introduced five years ago.

A team is to be set up to scrutinise the local authority’s process after a new report confirmed that there were just two successful transfers out of 67 enquiries since the Community Asset Transfer (CAT) scheme went live in August 2016.

What is a CAT?

A community organisation or charity can make a request to use land or buildings a council owns or rents from someone else.

They can ask to buy or lease the land or buildings or have other legal rights, for example to use the land.

The authority must listen to what the community body wants to do with the land or building.

If the authority does not agree to the request, the community transfer body can ask for the decision to be looked at again. Scottish Ministers have the final say.

Only two approvals

A report by Paul Vaughan, head of communities and neighbourhoods and Ken Gourlay, head of assets, transportation and environment, revealed that of 53 firm applications regarding possible property take over, just 25 made it through to stage two of the process and only two were eventually approved.

Only Kirkcaldy YMCA’s takeover of Gallatown Bowling Club in 2018 and Kingdom Brass Band’s purchase of the former library building in Kelty in April 2019 have been concluded.

The report added: “Twenty-five organisations were invited to submit stage two applications and there have been various outcomes in relation to the stage two process.

“Three organisations decided not to proceed with a CAT and withdrew their application however two organisations (Kingdom Brass Band and Kirkcaldy YMCA) have completed the CAT process and been successful in taking ownership of a council asset.”

The report further highlighted that 10 organisations had seen their stage two application approved by committee but formal offers of purchase were still to be forthcoming.

In addition, one organisation had gone on to lodge a formal appeal with the Scottish Ministers after it had been reject by the Fife authority.

Small change

The lack of success the past five years was criticised by Kirkcaldy area committee convener Neil Crooks.

He said: “The report throws up a number of questions, most notably whether the process has been a success or not.

“We’ve only processed two successful transfers in five years which is small change for such a significant resource that’s been put in by Fife Council.

“The report doesn’t tell us why people are being refused or even why we have one applicant feeling that it needs to lodge an appeal to the Scottish Government.

“Because of this I propose we set up a scrutiny panel to look into the reasons why this had been so unsuccessful in its time.”

Backing the call by Mr Crooks, fellow Labour councillor, Linda Erskine said the report threw up “more questions than answers”.

She added that communication of what assets were available as well as better explanation to organisations and community groups of the process were also essential.

The scrutiny panel will be made up of councillors, after a motion to set one up received cross-party backing.

Already a subscriber? Sign in