Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sheku Bayoh: Key questions answered as the inquiry into Fife man’s death meets in Edinburgh

Sheku Bayoh.

The Sheku Bayoh inquiry is due to be held in Edinburgh, beginning in May but there have been pre-inquiry meetings. We examine the current state of the six-year quest for answers about his death on a Fife street.

What’s the inquiry all about?

Father-of-two Mr Bayoh died in Kirkcaldy in May 2015 after he was detained by police officers.

The 31-year-old gas fitter had been spotted on Hayfield Road in the town in the early hours of May 3.

He was arrested and a struggle ensued between Mr Bayoh and multiple police officers seeking to restrain him, after which he died.

Sheku Bayoh
Sheku Bahoh

The circumstances around his death are the focus of the inquiry.

It has, so far gathered more than 21,000 documents for consideration from the likes of Police Scotland, the Crown and police watchdog PIRC.

Who is leading the inquiry?

The inquiry was announced by then-Justice secretary Humza Yousaf in November, 2020.

It will look at the circumstances of his death and the subsequent investigation.

It is led by Lord Bracadale, (Alastair P Campbell) who was a High Court judge from 2003 to his retiral in 2017.

Lord Bracadale
Lord Bracadale

That year, he was appointed by Scottish Ministers in 2017 to lead the Independent Review of Hate Crime Legislation.

Senior Counsel to the inquiry will be Angela Grahame QC.

In the first pre-inquiry session in November, Lord Bracadale expressed his sympathy to Mr Bayoh’s family and said he wants them “to be at the heart of this inquiry”.

He said they will have a chance to “speak publicly about the person he was, what he meant to them and the impact of his death” during proceedings.

Full coverage of the proceedings is available here and hearings can be accessed remotely.

What is the family’s position?

Mr Bayoh’s family has demanded answers about his death.

They remain angry that two years ago, the Lord Advocate confirmed no police officer, or Police Scotland, would face prosecution.

Aamer Anwar and Kadi Johnson
Mr Bayoh’s sister Kadi Johnson with family solicitor Aamer Anwar.

In a statement issued before the first hearing, they said: “The Bayoh family believe that Crown Office and the PIRC betrayed justice.

“The family believe the Crown Office at best were ‘institutionally incompetent’ and at worst engaged in a ‘systemic cover up’.

“But Sheku has a stubborn family who have refused to be bullied into silence.

“Six and a half years on, the family appreciate the massive scale of the inquiry and the thousands of documents needing to be examined.

“The family have placed their trust in the inquiry to be robust but the family wish however to place on notice the Crown Office, PIRC and Police Scotland, that they will not tolerate any attempt to delay and obstruct the inquiry in its search for the truth.”

Was race a factor in Mr Bayoh’s death?

Family and friends of Mr Bayoh have claimed his race was a factor in the manner in which he was arrested and dealt with on the night of his death.

The inquiry will examine whether this was the case.

Angela Grahame QC
Angela Grahame QC

It is expected to be a thread running throughout the sessions and form the focus of the final hearing.

Ms Grahame said: “We will be asking had Mr Sheku been white, would he and his family have been treated the same way, would the investigation have proceeded in the same way, would different choices have been made about the appropriate course of action?”

What has happened since?

A row broke out early in 2022 when police officers, supported by the Scottish Police Federation sought an undertaking preventing evidence given by them during the inquiry being used against them in potential future criminal proceedings.

However, Mr Bayoh’s family oppose it and said the move was “a demand for a convoluted form of immunity”.

In March, the Solicitor General for Scotland Ruth Charteris QC said no such undertaking will be given, leaving the door open for future prosecutions.

What next?

The outline for the inquiry was laid out in November.

It will consist of six hearings.

The first will deal with the events surrounding Mr Bayoh’s death, including the circumstances leading up to it, events in Kirkcaldy police office, the training of the officers involved and the equipment they used.

It will commence of May 10, 2022.

Why is this a key date for the inquiry?

Evidence from the night in question has never been led in a public forum.

This session will outline a chronology of events and hear from those involved in an official forum for the first time.

Sheku Bayoh with girlfriend Collette Bell
Sheku Bayoh with girlfriend Collette Bell

It will be the first time Mr Bayoh’s family will have heard about his death from those who were there at the time.

Statements are already being prepared ahead of this date.

What will later sessions deal with?

Hearing two will examine the cause of death.

Mr Bayoh was arrested on Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy

Hearing three will look at the post-incident management by PIRC, Police Scotland the Crown office, including liaison with the family.

Later hearings will focus on media engagement and parallel investigations.

So when will race be considered?

The final hearing will deal with this aspect.

Thursday’s session was told: “In the final hearing, we will seek to draw together all the evidence heard at each hearing regarding race.

“We will identify any evidence of overt racism, failures or inadequacies and evidence of any aspect of events which could potentially give rise to an inference decisions and outcomes were based on race.”