Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors want more powers to cope with flooding

Councillor Mark Hood.
Councillor Mark Hood.

Fife councillors are to press the Scottish Government to change the law to give local authorities more teeth to deal with flooding.

Holyrood is being urged to confer greater powers on the council when it comes to gaining access to private land and then to recover expenses from landowners for flood prevention work it is forced to carry out.

Cowdenbeath area committee came up with the plan in response to a long running saga in Cardenden where widespread and prolonged flooding caused misery to local home owners.

The council was stymied by a lack of powers as it waded into the Jamphlars Pond project.

It had real difficulties in getting on to the land to carry out the dredging work on the burn running to the pond.

Then it was unable to recover costs from the private landowner who hadn’t maintained sections of the burn.

While local authorities do have certain flood risk management duties, it is ultimately the responsibility of the land and property owners to protect against flooding.

Local councillor Linda Erskine said Jamphlars had been a “quite torturous process” to get to a conclusion.

“A lot of people were suffering, and there has been a lot of misunderstanding of what the council could and could not do.”

Committee chairman Mark Hood said the Jamphlars debacle had had a huge impact on local residents, many of whom were coming to the councillors for advice, as flood water encroached on their gardens and lapped almost to the doors of their homes.

“The only advice we were able to give was to raise a civil action against the landowner.

“But we were unable to do anything to help and I still believe that is a gap.”

In this instance the council had been able to help, but the councillor wanted tougher action.

“I would like to see some strengthening of the powers that local authorities have in matters such as this,” he said.

Leeza Clark reflects on a decade of watery misery:

Cardenden residents went through a decade of misery and confusion while the murky ochre tainted water inched ever closer to their homes.

They had been plagued for years with shoddy drainage but hoped they were home and dry when a Scottish Government-funded plan, which was to include water treatment lagoons, got underway.

However, they were disappointed when the council said that work would comprise solely of clearing inlet and outlet ditches of the pond and then work with private landowners to ensure ditches were maintained.

More than 1,200 metres of watercourses, on both private and council-owned land, were cleared of silt and debris.

Local residents were said to be satisfied with the eventual outcome, but had to endure delays as negotiations with landowners took place.

The protracted negotiation also put a strain on council resources.

It was felt the project had started with good intentions, seeing the chance to do something for the community with grants which, outwith the council’s normal legislative regime, would not otherwise be possible.

But it said this raised expectations it could not ultimately deliver and pressure had to be put on landowners to obtain their permission – they have been informed of their responsibilities in maintaining drainage ditches on their properties.

The Scottish Government agreed to the money it provided being used in this way and agreed the council could keep any leftover funds to use on other former industrial sites in the Fife area “where public health risk is a high priority”.