Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Developers refuse to stump up £700,000 for Dunfermline roadworks

An artist's impression of the proposed development.
An artist's impression of the proposed development.

Developers behind controversial plans to expand Halbeath Retail Park have made a bid to avoid paying £700,000 for roadworks.

Last year, West Planning Committee voted seven votes to five in favour of approving the plans for nine shops and food outlets east of Dunfermline, against a recommendation to refuse on the grounds it would take trade away from the town centre.

But the plans were granted with the condition attached that the applicant Royal London pay £703,234 towards strategic transportation interventions including a new northern link road.

Now Royal London wants that planning obligation removed.

The company has argued that the development is exempt from a planning contribution because the only unit the obligation applies to has a floorspace less than the threshold of 27,000 square feet.

However, Fife Council planners have argued that the whole of the development should be taken into account.

Councillors on West Planning Committee, who meet on Wednesday, have been recommended to refuse Royal London’s application to have the planning obligation removed.

The report going before councillors stated: “When considering whether a site requires to make a planning contribution there is a two stage process.

“The first stage is considering whether the type of development breaches any threshold for when a contribution is required. It is the overall gross floorspace of development which is used to consider whether a site needs to make a contribution rather than the net development floorspace following the application of other exemptions.”

The report went on: “The applicant also argues that this site needs no strategic transport interventions for it to be acceptable.

“They note that the northern link road — one of the strategic transport
interventions — is adjacent to their site and that the completion of this or the reservation of the land for its construction was not required for this development.

“No evidence has been provided by the applicant that none of the strategic transport interventions are required for their development.”

The expansion site, to the north of the existing Halbeath Retail Park units, has been subject to a number of planning applications but a previous proposal lapsed in December 2010 before any work was started.

To date, no work has started on the current plans.