Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Ruthven caravan plans approved: Here’s why Angus councillors gave green light despite resident objections

The River Isla.
The River Isla.

Councillors have approved plans for a caravan site in rural Angus, despite safety concerns raised by nearby residents.

Proposals for a caravan site containing 41 static homes in Brigton of Ruthven were narrowly voted through by Angus Council’s development standards committee on December 15.

However, several nearby residents spoke out against the application at the meeting, citing safety concerns.

The application was for a change of use from the site’s former use as a tree nursery.

Why did residents object?

It was claimed the narrows roads in the area will lead to an accident, especially when school children are on holiday.

The site’s proximity to the “ferocious” River Isla was also mentioned.

Among the residents who spoke out was Liz Hamilton, who said the plans were not in keeping with the surroundings.

Mrs Hamilton, who is also a community councillor for the area, said: “Ruthven is a very quiet, rural hamlet, with approximately 23 to 30 houses. The population is probably no more than 60 to 80.

“The application will change the demographic area completely… more than doubling the population.

“There are no shops or local amenities… within walking distance. Every time you need a pint of milk, it’s a car journey of six miles.

“The access along the U100 (a nearby road) is unsuitable for all the extra proposed journeys.

“The consultant states that by adding two passing places, this will make it all acceptable. What he does not address is the junction from the U100 on to the A926.

“It is a blind junction with no clear line of sight. A driver has to creep out with the nose of the car over the carriageway into the flow of the oncoming traffic before you have a clear sight.

“At which point you are a sitting target for any fast bikers approaching… or cars.

“The only comment the consultant has made regarding this junction is that there has been no reported accidents. But I can assure you, if you talk to locals, there have been plenty of near misses.”

Several councillors agreed with the concerns, adding that it would bring little economic benefit to Angus as the site is close to the border with the Perth and Kinross area.

Why did councillor approve the development?

Despite the objections, Councillor Alex King reminded the committee the plans were recommended for approval and an appeal with the Scottish Government would therefore likely succeed.

He said: “This application complies with our policies. The officers are recommending that we approve it.

“If we find some spurious reasons, like kids playing in the burn, when we’re told the demographic is people aged 55 to 60 who don’t normally have young kids with them, then it’ll get thrown out when the applicant takes this to an appeal.

“I don’t think we should be making extra work when we know if this goes to the Scottish office, the Scottish office will approve it because our officers have recommended approval.

“I think we have to take the common sense approach. There’s a huge stack of conditions on this to control the situation… and I think we should approve it.”

Councillor Richard Moore said: “While the roads issue is very concerning, I don’t believe it is something we could base a refusal on. I think we have to look at the site.”

A motion to approve the application won by six votes to five.

Who is behind the plans?

The application was brought forward by Perth-based Morris Leslie Ltd, which was established in 1974.

Founder Morris Leslie won an outstanding contribution gong at the 2019 Courier Business Awards.

Originally a plant sales business, the firm has diversified into other areas in recent years, including property and commercial auctions.

Once built, Morris Leslie intends to sell the caravans.

David Queripel, representing the applicant on behalf of agents Montgomery Forgan Associates, said at the meeting: “The applicant envisages a five-star holiday site, occupied by high-quality lodge style caravans.

“A lot of hard work has gone into addressing issues raised at the preapplication stage and in the early life of the planning application.

“I am aware that concerns have been raised by third parties about a variety of matters.

“I would like to assure anyone with concerns that the holiday caravan site will be a good neighbour.”

What conditions have been imposed?

Six conditions have been attached to the approval of the development.

These include:

  • Documents outlining tree protection measures, foul water outfall and a traffic management plan be submitted before construction work begins
  • Passing places are installed on a nearby road
  • No more than 41 caravans will be allowed on site
  • The homes will be for holiday use only and not permanent habitation
  • No caravan will be occupied for no more than 12 weeks in any 26 week period