Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Claims Angus court’s £1.5m investment costs ‘do not add up’

The former Arbroath Sheriff Court
The former Arbroath Sheriff Court

Scotland’s court service has been slammed over costs which “do not add up” at the remaining seat of justice in Angus.

The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has spent more than £1.5 million on Forfar Sheriff Court since closing Arbroath to save cash in the long term.

The decision to “target” more spending on Forfar has been described as “a shambles” following a subsequent choice to send the most serious cases to Dundee.

The SCTS has spent £1,509,620 on capital upgrades at Forfar in four years, against cost savings of £64,147 made by closing the former court in Arbroath.

The service maintained its increased level of spending on Forfar is not “in any way” related to increased business, and that direct spending to accommodate the additional Arbroath business totals £0.25m.

Solicitor Nick Whelan, one local agent who said the move of all business to Forfar would cause financial hardship to less affluent clients, believes the increase in spending massively outstrips any savings.

North East MSP Alex Johnstone, who also spoke out against centralising justice in 2013, fears the increasing costs at Forfar will lead to a decision to move all justice services to Dundee.

In its Shaping Scotland’s Court Services Evaluation Report, the SCTS states the three-year saving for closing 10 sheriff courts and seven justice of the peace courts across Scotland is £2,072,000 — an increase of £19K from the original evaluation report.

Mr Whelan said the £64,147 earned by closing Arbroath does not defray the cost to the public and their solicitors in travel.

He said: “It is clear that the cost saving projections that prompted the closure quite simply do not add up. That figure does not include the additional cost of travel expenses of witnesses and solicitors travelling to Forfar.

“Nor does it include the obvious difficulty for members of the public who seek to access justice whose rights are clearly being curtailed by the closure of courts.”

Mr Johnstone said: “This process has been an unmitigated shambles from start to finish.

“The public were against the decision to close the Arbroath court and the SNP failed to listen.

“The legal profession were against this and again the SNP would not listen, and we now know that the financial arguments used to justify the whole shabby scenario are woefully off the mark.”

“It seems to me that ultimately, these figures will be used to justify sending all court business to Dundee, making justice even more remote from the communities it is supposed to serve.

“With the Arbroath court building still lying empty, perhaps the Scottish Government should review this debacle, and consider reopening it.

“The Scottish justice system was once the envy of the world.

“Now it is reduced to empty buildings and video booths.”

Court service responds

A spokesman said: “Any suggestion that the investment in Forfar was misguided, or that the court is being downgraded and activity centralised in Dundee is totally inaccurate.

“The Shaping Scotland’s Court Services report, published in April 2013, set out our long term plans for the court estate which included the creation of a sheriff and jury centre in Dundee. The sheriff and jury trials transferring to Dundee are a small element of Forfar’s overall business and Forfar will continue to deal with all summary criminal cases and the full range of civil and family cases.

“SCTS has a significant estate with 71 properties valued in excess of £375m, with annual running costs in excess of £30m. Given the largely historic nature of our estate and the continual demand for service improvement, we have a rolling investment programme of maintenance and improvement across all of our courts. One of the benefits of our new court structure is the ability to target investment in a smaller number properties to improve facilities for all court users.

“Forfar has benefited from this much needed investment, which is entirely consistent with our long term plans as set out in our Shaping Scotland’s Court Services report.”