Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Angus skip site aggression rockets since issue of body cams to staff

Post Thumbnail

Incidents of abuse and violence towards Angus skip site staff have rocketed since the controversial introduction of body cameras earlier this year.

Since the equipment was issued in January, the rate of reported aggression has almost doubled from last year – with recorded incidents also greater in just four months than those noted the whole of 2016/17.

It has also emerged, however, that there is no record of verbal or physical attacks being reported to police in the past three years, and no prosecutions in court.

At the beginning of the year Angus councillors took the decision to equip recycling centre staff with body cameras after officials reported a worrying increase in aggression at skip sites across the area.

The rise was blamed on factors including charges for commercial dumping, changes to opening hours and new rules including a ban on trailers over six feet long at the majority of Angus sites.

Freedom of Information data has now revealed that the authority laid out £8,400 on equipping 16 staff with the cameras.

They were in use at all seven recycling centres by January 18, and in the period to May 22 there were five reports of violence and aggression.

In 2017/18 there were seven reported incidents, compared to four in 2016/17 and five the previous year.

A council spokesperson said: “These incidents were formally reported when an employee in the course, or as a consequence, of work activities was made to feel that either themselves of others were personally threatened or in danger.”

The council said it did not have a record of how many incidents were reported to police.

It also confirmed it did not have information on any reports which resulted in court action, but said it was not aware of any prosecutions in the past three years.

Forfar Conservative councillor Braden Davy said the issuing of cameras may have given staff more confidence to report attacks by angry customers.

“Nobody should have to work in an environment in which they do not feel safe, and body cameras are an important way of ensuring members of staff at our recycling centres, and members of the public, do feel secure when using our centres,” he said.

“We know of incidents targeted towards staff and body cameras help provide vital evidence in dealing with any incidents.

“They’ve also provided further evidence of whether there have been any safety breaches at our centres. Body cams can provide clarity over what happened, when, and allow procedures to be put in place to improve the safety for the public and council staff.

“There should be zero tolerance when it comes to abuse towards members of staff who are doing a job for us, the members of the public. I can fully appreciate sometimes frustration can build if there are issues, but this should never result in verbal or physical abuse.

“It is perhaps true that there is now more awareness of reporting violence or aggression towards staff, and more evidence of it, so staff feel more confident and comfortable in doing this.

“This may in part explain the increase in the number of reports recently,” he added.

“However, all of us have a duty to treat each other with respect and there should be zero tolerance towards aggressive, or violence targeted at anyone – no matter what the circumstances.”