Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillors in Dundee have refused Tim Hortons plans again — here’s why

A Tim Hortons in Shanghai, China.
A Tim Hortons in Shanghai, China.

Councillors in Dundee defied planning officers and refused to grant permission for a drive-thru coffee shop to be built near the Kingsway.

The application from Canadian firm Tim Hortons was rejected amid concerns the site at the New Craigie Retail Park would draw shoppers away from the city centre.

Council officers had stated that planning permission in principle had already been granted in 2017 for several units and advised that members of the planning committee could only lay down conditions on matters such as infrastructure.

However, an amendment by councillor Richard McCready to refuse permission was passed by 13 votes to five.

Councillors rejected similar plans by Tim Hortons in November last year under a different type of planning application.

Critics accused the company of using the 2017 permission as a means of circumventing planning procedure at the committee meeting on Monday night, but councillors were told the firm was within its rights to apply in such a manner.

In his amendment, Mr McCready said: “The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposals would minimise the need to travel by private car and result in an unacceptable increase in traffic.”

Another councillor Christina Roberts described the application as an “unusual” one.

Why do the different types of application matter?

Gregor Hamilton, head of planning economic development, told the committee: “Planning permission in principal was granted in 2017 and that gives the option for applicants to submit two types of applications.

“They could either submit a full planning permission and by doing so that is an application that can be considered afresh and considered on its own merits. That’s what the applicant chose to do with the previous proposal that was considered in November 2020.

“The other route that is available to the applicant is to submit what is called an approval of matters specified in condition application.

“Because of that direct relationship that exists between the application and the decision the planning committee took in 2017, those matters of principal have been established and that will be taken into consideration… should the committee refuse planning permission it would be something that is likely to be taken into consideration should the applicant also seek to appeal that decision.

“I think a reporter looking at this would question the decision to refuse if the grounds of refusal are relating to the principal of this use on this site.”

Tim Hortons submitted an appeal against the November 2020 rejection with the Scottish Government, but that case is currently on hold because of lockdown.