Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Tayside councils lose court case over roadworks fiasco

Post Thumbnail

Councils in Tayside have lost a legal bid to win damages from a company they say supplied faulty materials for roadworks.

Tayside Contracts, which is made up of Angus, Dundee and Perth & Kinross councils, claimed the surface dressing they carried out failed because the aggregate chippings from D Geddes Contractors were “not fit for purpose”.

That meant they did not embed properly into the road surface, the group of councils argued.

But their claim was rejected by the Court of Session, which ruled the link between the chippings and the surfacing problems was not established.

In his judgment, Lord Doherty said: “The pursuers have failed to prove their case. It follows that the defender is entitled to decree of absolvitor.”

The judge was critical of the lack of evidence presented by Tayside Contracts to back up the claims about the chippings, with just one photograph of a site in Angus produced.

The roadworks started in summer 2010 but the scale of the loose chippings only emerged at the turn of year.

That followed a cold winter, but the councils argued that other parts of Scotland which had suffered similar weather did not have the same problems.

They said that severe weather and issues with embedding procedures may have contributed to the failures, but the “only possible initiating cause” was the chippings.

A spokesman for D Geddes, which is based in Arbroath, said: “We are extremely pleased with the opinion of Lord Doherty.

“The opinion has vindicated our stance on this matter.

“We will consult with our relevant advisors and make comment on how we wish to proceed in due course.”

Tayside Contracts declined to comment on the outcome of the case and did not respond to questions on disruption to motorists and the financial burden borne by the taxpayer, including court costs.

Angus and Perth & Kinross councils said the action was brought by Tayside Contracts and they would not be commenting.

A Dundee City Council spokesman said: “We are currently studying the detail of the court’s decision.”