Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Ultraviolet light treatment could save NHS millions according to Dundee University research

Phototherapy could be a more effective way of treating skin diseases like psoriasis.
Phototherapy could be a more effective way of treating skin diseases like psoriasis.

The NHS could save millions of pounds by treating skin conditions with ultraviolet light rather than medicines, a major new Dundee University study has found.

Research carried out by the University’s School of Medicine has found that course of phototherapy could be more effective than creams, pills or injections for many skin complaints.

Dr John Foerster and his team discovered the annual per-patient cost of filtered UV light treatment is actually around £250.

This is around one sixth of the cost of phototherapy estimated by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and a fraction of the price of injectable therapies, which cost between £7,000 and £12,000 per year.

Dr John Foerster.

Steroid creams frequently prescribed for skin diseases can cause serious side effects and can prove inadequate to bring diseases such as psoriasis and eczema under control.

Patients may then be referred for more intensive treatment, which could include pills, injections or phototherapy.

If phototherapy had not been available in the NHS Tayside area, alternative drug-based treatments would have cost the cash-strapped health board an extra £3,353 per patient each year

This equates to an average annual saving of £2.2 million for psoriasis patients alone.

Despite this, the researchers believe misconceptions about the cost of delivering phototherapy means healthcare providers are reluctant to increase availability, with many areas across the UK  poorly served by phototherapy facilities.

Dr Foerster said: “UV light treatment is effective, is less invasive and has fewer side effects than alternative therapies, and can deliver massive cost savings.

“Phototherapy can reduce the symptoms of psoriasis and eczema and the need for steroid creams and we have now shown that if you allocate staff hours and provide access with reasonable waiting times the patients can derive benefit while saving money.

“Popping a pill to treat skin conditions may seem a cheap treatment but staff are still required to carry out blood checks in a lab. It would be fantastic if everyone had the opportunity to try something that circumvents the need for any laboratory monitoring and potential side-effects in the first place.

“Injectable drugs commonly cost £10,000 per patient annually. These can be effective but are extremely expensive and so avoiding the need for this, or even for delaying it by a year, can save millions.

“We found that phototherapy treatment costs around £250 per person per year. Each treatment only takes up a very small percentage of the staff members’ overall workload compared to how many treatments are given out.”

Phototherapy involves safe, controlled delivery of narrow wavebands of ultraviolet radiation in specially constructed cabins.

The Dundee team had previously shown that three-quarters of patients experienced significant improvements after phototherapy and the need for steroid creams was reduced by 25%.

Dr Foerster added:”The NICE appraisal puts the cost of phototherapy at £1800 per treatment. Our data will require this to be corrected, which we hope will have positive implications for sufferers of skin diseases.”

The research has published online by the British Journal of Dermatology.