Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Cupar North plan could “swamp” town, says Willie Rennie

Plans for Cupar North.
Plans for Cupar North.

A call for Fife Council planners to reconsider a policy which could result in around 1,400 houses being built in Cupar has been made by Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie.

The Cupar North proposal would see the former market town increase in size by almost one third, and Mr Rennie waded into the debate yesterday by suggesting that the scale of development would put extreme pressure on many services in the town.

The major expansion of the town was first mooted in 2005, and the Cupar North Consortium – led by three developers Persimmon Homes, Headon Developments and Vico Properties – is ploughing ahead through the planning process.

But Mr Rennie said: “I have not commented before on this proposal but when I see the concerns of national organisations such as SEPA and Transport Scotland it is obvious such a massive development should not go ahead.

“Communities should grow gradually and not have massive developments such as Cupar North thrust upon them.

“It is obvious from the many local residents who have contacted me on the matter that they are concerned about the negative effects of such a major development, such as over burdening health services and the lack of capacity in local schools for additional pupils.

“Others have mentioned the increased risk of flooding in the Lady Burn area and the lack of spare capacity in the local sewerage works as reasons why the housing development should not go ahead and local shopkeepers have expressed opposition to creating an out of town retail park which will do nothing for Cupar.”

Mr Rennie said he could not understand why the development proposal was still being considered as the original rationale was the creation of a bypass.

“The recent traffic improvements in Cupar are working well if anything, the problem lies in the traffic coming in from the south and that will not be helped by an east/west relief road on the north side of town,” he added.

“I think the planners need to revisit this proposal which has consistently been rejected by residents and local representatives.

“It may be appropriate for larger towns and cities to have this scale of housing but it would swamp Cupar and should be removed as a development site.”

However, David Wardrop, planning consultant and spokesperson for the consortium, confirmed: “The Cupar North Consortium’s current planning application is based on the principles set out in the approved development plan for the area which includes Tayplan and the adopted St Andrews and East Fife Local Plan.

“The consortium’s master plan for the expansion of Cupar aims to deliver a well-planned long-term expansion of Cupar that delivers a range of key benefits to the wider community.

“These benefits will include a new primary school, land designated for healthcare, an open space network and the new relief road which will divert heavy goods vehicles away from the town centre.

“These additional benefits cannot be delivered as a result of unplanned, incremental development around the town which will only serve to exacerbate the education, healthcare and traffic situation to the south of the town.

“As sector leading house builders with extensive local and UK wide experience we understand the market and are confident that we will improve upon the recession-based completion rates quoted to deliver an incremental development and expect these improved completion rates will have a positive effect on local businesses.

“The consortium has maintained a transparent approach throughout the planning process and is keen to work through any issues which arise as a result of the reports it has commissioned in support of the application.”