Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Villagers fear road network won’t cope with proposed new Kincaple holiday park

Kincaple residents Carol Pickthall and Allan Burns are just toe who are opposed to the development.
Kincaple residents Carol Pickthall and Allan Burns are just toe who are opposed to the development.

Plans for a new holiday park to be built on farmland near St Andrews have been met with resistance from local villagers.

Developers on behalf of St Andrews Forest Lodges Ltd, have submitted plans for 18 new holiday lodges, a reception, caretaker’s building and a biomass plant, close to the tiny settlement of Kincaple off the A91.

The firm already operate the 17 lodge Woodland Leisure Park in the village which it purchased in 2014.

In its design statement, the company said the development would provide four-star accomodation which would in turn benefit the local economy with increased local spend from visitors.

It also added that the new lodges would be enclosed by mature forestation and further hidden by “screen landscaping, both locally within the site, and remotely along the A91”.

The planning application has already attracted a raft of objections.

However, the proposal has already attracted a raft of objections from villagers, who also have Strathkinness Community Council backing their claims that the park would have negative impact on the local road infrastructure, congestion and daily life in the hamlet.

Kincaple resident Carol Pickthall fears the increase in traffic would be unsustainable.

Villagers have raised their concerns with Strathkinness Community Council and Fife MP, Wendy Chamberlain.

She said: “The road network surrounding Kincaple is wholly unsuited for the increased level of traffic this holiday park would undoubtedly bring.

“Add to that the impact on the character of the village as well as the local environment and it should not go ahead.”

Fellow resident, Allan Burns, added that he was alarmed over the lack of an environmental impact assessment.

“Considering the size of the development in relation to the village as well as in addition to so much other development in the area, I’m astounded that an impact assessment hasn’t been requested.

“The very least we should expect is for Fife Council to conduct a full and transparent planning process.”

In response, a Fife Council spokesman confirmed that the scale of the application  was not required to be considered under the Environmental Impact Assessment legislation.

He added: “However all the potential relevant environmental impacts and issues will be assessed through the planning application process.”

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Strathkinnes Community Council said it had also opposed the plans.

They added: “Residents have highlighted genuine concerns that the local road network will not cope with the large increase of traffic that the development would attract and we agreed.”

Addressing concerns, a spokesperson for St Andrews Forest Lodges, said: “The proposals include a new entrance remote from the village, which directs all traffic from the new and existing holiday park.

“In addition new passing places and improvements to the junction with the A71, as well as improved signage are investments made that will ensure a real reduction in traffic through Kincaple Village.”

Villagers also met with Fife Liberal Democrat MP Wendy Chamberlain recently to voice their concerns.

In response, Mrs Chamberlain said: “Given its locality it’s clear that an impact assessment beyond the bounds of the application area would be beneficial to ensure that all considerations are taken into account.

“I am working with the Fife Council Roads Services team to have some of those issues addressed.

“Clearly this development would have an additional impact on that, and that should also be taken into account.”