Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

University’s ducting plan “putting lipstick on a pig”

The ducting and air conditioning equipment.
The ducting and air conditioning equipment.

St Andrews University has been accused of “putting lipstick on the pig” in a long-running dispute over unsightly aluminium ducting on its student union building.

Former student leader, Michael Rolland, whose home overlooks the union, said the university continued to dodge planning requirements in the “fiasco” over the building in St Andrews’ conservation area.

However, the university insisted its response to an unforeseen mistake was an example of its good faith and the solution proposed was an excellent one.

An air conditioning unit likened y critics to an oil refinery was erected on the roof three years ago without planning consent, to the anger of residents in neighbouring Hope Street, Abbotsford Place and Greyfriars Garden.

Retrospective permission was refused by Fife Council in September 2016 but instead of removing the equipment the university has applied for consent for replacement ductwork covered with a vinyl camouflage wrap.

Retired investment banker Mr Rolland, a student union president in the 1960s, said: “This is a cynical attempt by the university to avoid the expense of correcting their mistakes by merely putting lipstick on the pig while leaving the improper structures in place.”

The only changes proposed, he said, were a slight reduction in the height of the ducts and a “bizarre plan” to wrap them in vinyl sheeting with a camouflage pattern, which he likened to heavy duty wallpaper.

Fife Council’s north east planning committee is due to consider the planning application on Wednesday and Mr Rolland urged members to remind the university of its responsibility to meet conservation area standards and prevent a “very bad precedent” for future developments in the town.

He said: “Along with other local alumni and many concerned citizens, I hope that Fife councillors will protect our historic town and require the university to do the right thing in this sad matter.”

A university spokesman said Mr Rolland’s comments were misleading and disappointing but his frustration at the pace of progress was shared.

He said: “We would have liked to move more quickly towards remedial work on the ducting, which we have always acknowledged was not installed in line with our design, intentions or planning permission.

“However, after initial delays for which we have fulsomely and repeatedly apologised, we set aside more time to consult the neighbours.”

He said the scheme now proposed emerged as a result of those conversations with St Andrews Preservation Trust and six property owners.

He said: “The current plan to reduce, reposition and camouflage the ducting is an excellent one.

 

“The refurbished students’ association is an asset to the town.

“The process to mitigate an unforeseen mistake during its redevelopment is an example of the university’s good faith and we hope that the spirit of civil dialogue will continue to prevail among the majority of the association’s neighbours.”