Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Insufficient parking’ could see plans for Pitlochry train car restaurant derailed

Fergus McCallum alongside wife Isara McCallum (right) and daughter Mia McCallum (left) in Rie-Achan Car Park, Rie-Achan Road, Pitlochry.
Fergus McCallum alongside wife Isara McCallum (right) and daughter Mia McCallum (left) in Rie-Achan Car Park, Rie-Achan Road, Pitlochry.

Plans for a restaurant in old train carriages could be rejected due to fears over a loss of parking.

Perth and Kinross Council planning officials have recommended that a proposal for the Thai restaurant in two 40-year-old British rail cars be rejected.

Pharmaceuticals executive Fergus McCalIum and his wife Isara aim to convert the two cars into a 60-seat restaurant, which will be based in a Pitlochry car park.

They have already had their two carriages, InterCity 125 coaches from Great Western Railway, repainted in their British Rail blue, however there are now concerns that the plan may go off the rails.

A new report from planning officers has recommended that councillors reject the plans, due to the impact that it will have on parking in the area.

Fergus McCallum’s wife Isara McCallum (right) and daughter Mia McCallum.

It reads: “It is considered that in the absence of evidence either held by the council or
submitted by the agent, the council cannot support the loss of parking at this
location at this time.

“The proposal also raises road safety concerns which have not been addressed within the submission.

“Policy encourages the retention of existing transport infrastructure and the proposal will reduce parking within this well used carpark which will be compounded with the potential use of further parking for staff and patrons.”

The report also expresses a number of safety concerns about the proposition, continuing: “It has not been demonstrated that the servicing of the railway carriage
and pedestrian safety can be accommodated.”

‘Advised to withdraw’

However, Fergus and Isara are still planning to continue with their application.

The pair have claimed the council had previously been helpful with the plans, however suddenly changed their tone last month.

Fergus said: “We’ve been working with the council for just short of a year and up until recently they were absolutely brilliant.

“Everybody was supporting us, but then on February 17 the tone was totally changed.

“We were advised to withdraw the plan and now this report has come out.

Fergus and his family don’t plan to withdraw their application.

“It was like invasion of the bodysnatchers, as if they had all come down and been swapped overnight.

“Since February 17 it’s just been different, we got an email saying that they no longer supported it.

“We’ve spent over £78,000, it’s all my life savings have gone into this, and the support is just gone.

“We were told that we could withdraw and get some of our money back, but we don’t want to.

“My wife just wants to open a nice Thai restaurant, give people lovely food and employ four or five people in the area.”

Decision time

The report is ahead of the council’s planning and development management committee on Wednesday

A spokesman for Perth and Kinross Council said: “The Planning and Development Management Committee will consider this application on Wednesday April 7.

“Officers have recommended refusal of the application because of road safety concerns, the loss of parking spaces in Pitlochry and because it is contrary to the development plan.

“Officers advised Mr McCallum in February he could withdraw his application and resubmit it when he had secured a site for his proposed development.”