Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scone votes against massive housing plan

Scone housing protesters gather at Perth and Kinross Council HQ.
Scone housing protesters gather at Perth and Kinross Council HQ.

A survey has revealed overwhelming opposition to a huge housing expansion at one of Scotland’s biggest villages.

Nearly half the population of Scone voted in a poll to gauge support for 700 new homes on the edge of the village.

The results show that more than 98% are against the development. They say it should not go ahead before the long-awaited Cross Tay Link Road – which will connect Scone with the A9 – has been put in place.

The questionnaire, which was carried out by members of the community council, also revealed that 96.1% were against allowing a first phase of 100 houses before the bridge is ready.

And 1,151 of the 1,190 households which replied said that Scone could not absorb an increase in traffic.

The results of the survey were handed over to officials at Perth and Kinross Council on Wednesday. Around 30 residents with placards and banners staged a demonstration in the grounds of the local authority’s headquarters.

An artist's impression of the Scone development from December 2015.
An artist’s impression of the Scone development from December 2015.

The housing plan was first raised in 2007 and a poll conducted by the council at the time showed 80% were opposed.

The latest plan, by construction firm A&J Stephen, was unveiled earlier this year. The company wants to build on acres of farmland between Spoutswell Drive and Angus Road.

If approved, the local population could soar by almost half. Opponents argue that the development will lead to a huge increase in congestion and a rise in pollution problems.

Resident Jill Belch, who is a professor at the University of Dundee’s school of medicine, said the housing plan could have a major, negative impact on the health of local people.

“There was a recent QC ruling which makes it illegal for an authority to allow a development which could exacerbate pollution problems where there is a known risk,” she said.

“If this went ahead without the new bridge, the risks would be unacceptable and would have very harmful effects on people of all ages, from womb to tomb.”

Locals are also worried that the project will destroy wildlife and nature including pine martens, roe deer and ancient trees.

A spokesman for the community council’s study group, which was set up to assess Stephen’s application, said: “Once the trees are gone, the wildlife will disappear too. Its all very well for a company to say its going to plant more trees, but that simply isn’t going to work.

“We are not being ‘nimby’ about this. We want to protect this land for residents, as well as the many, many visitors who come here.”

Local councillor Dennis Melloy said he was “absolutely astonished” that nearly 50% of the village voted. “It has been a tremendous effort by the community council.”

Councillor Lewis Simpson added: “We have incontrovertible proof that the majority of residents are against this plan. If it is approved, it will be forced upon the people of Scone against their wishes.”

Developer John Stephen said: “The land at North Scone has been identified by Perth and Kinross Council for residential development in the adopted Local Development Plan.  This decision was taken several years ago by the council so the principal of housing on this land had already been established.”

He said: “As a firm of local housebuilders, we are simply bringing forward our plans to meet that need, and which we are confident fulfil the council’s requirements.

“We recognise, as with any large scale, proposed planning application, that a range of feedback will be submitted and strong views raised and it is unfortunate when some views are based on misleading information. As part of the statutory planning process, all feedback will be taken on board.”