Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plan scrapped to protect homes from flooding

Flooding near Coupar Angus.
Flooding near Coupar Angus.

Council bosses are poised to pull the plug on flood defences work planned for two Perthshire communities.

Projects proposed for Bankfoot and Coupar Angus are being scrapped after analysts revealed costs could run into millions of pounds.

Perth and Kinross Council has been working on the plans for several years. Homes were evacuated when both communities were badly hit during torrential downpours in 2004.

Last year saw five homes swamped in Bankfoot and more flooding in and around Coupar Angus, with the main road between the town and Blairgowrie closed for days.

The Coupar Angus-Blairgowrie road which flooded for several days in early 2016.
The Coupar Angus-Blairgowrie road which flooded for several days in early 2016.

Following an extensive study by consultants CH2M, the council believes neither plan is “not economically viable”.

Water containment work at Bankfoot alone is estimated at £13.6 million and that is just one of a range of options which was considered for the area.

The consultants’ assessment also rules that dredging Coupar Angus burn would be around £1.8 million.

Next week, members of the environment committee will be urged to rubber-stamp the death of both schemes.

The council would however continue protection efforts as set out in the Sepa-led Tay Flood Risk Management Strategy.

In a report to councillors, a flooding team spokesman stated: “CH2M considered eleven potential options for managing flood risk within Bankfoot and these were evaluated against various technical, environmental and economic criteria.

“In managing flood risk, the council is required to have regard to the economic, social and environmental impact of its actions. The Scottish Government’s guidance recommends that a project appraisal – including a cost-benefit analysis – is the most appropriate approach to determine whether a flood protection scheme is worthwhile and represents value for money.

“In general, the cost of flood damage avoided over time must be greater than the cost of building the flood defences.”

He said the Bankfoot scheme did not score a high benefit/cost ratio.

Jane Bechtel, who chairs the Auchtergaven Community Council, said: “I can’t say I’m happy about this, I’m not.

“But it is what we were expecting would happen. The simple fact is there isn’t the money to go ahead with the scheme at Bankfoot or anywhere else.

“However, now that we know that the main work isn’t going to happen, we can go ahead and look at smaller scale flood prevention works for the area.”

She said: “Flooding in Bankfoot is quite specific and isolated. In the past few years, there has been about 10 houses which have become uninhabitable and these have since been upgraded.”

Wendy McCombes, chair of Coupar Angus and Bendochty Community Council, added: “It is unfortunate that the seven major flood protection measures examined were not found to be economically viable and the council has decided not to proceed with any of them.

“We understand that informed decisions have to be made in times of financial constraint and that the council did not feel able to spend around £1 million to prevent homes and business in the town flooding.”

She said: “The community council understands the frustration of home and business owners and is still in communication with the council about the possible re-siting of pipes over the Coupar Burn, the clearance of debris from the burn and also ensuring households along the burn keep the edges of the burn free from potential debris such as garden furniture and bikes.”