Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Major Perthshire project in the balance

Stephen Leckie with the Crieff Hydro East development plans.
Stephen Leckie with the Crieff Hydro East development plans.

The businessman behind a potential £100 million development warned the major investment could be lost to Perthshire.

Stephen Leckie, chief executive of Crieff Hydro Ltd, was speaking after the latest setback to his vision to build 200 holiday lodges, a 100-bed care home and assisted living accommodation for another 100 people, as well as leisure facilities on land near Gilmerton.

He believes the project would create scores of jobs and inject around £25 million into the Scottish economy each year.

The Crieff East plan was rejected by Perth and Kinross Council earlier this year when officials told Mr Leckie that crucial information on air quality had not been submitted to planners on time, though the developers claimed the report had  already been sent to the council’s environmental health department.

At a meeting of the council’s local review board Mr Leckie suffered another blow when he challenged the ruling.

Board convener Councillor Murray Lyall said that the application had been dealt with in a “piecemeal” fashion but he was of the opinion that they should uphold the initial refusal on the grounds of lack of information, which was endorsed by the board members.

He did leave the door open to Mr Leckie and his team telling them there was still the chance to reapply which would then be determined by the full council.

“This would give an opportunity for all the information to be dealt with at the one time,” he said.

Following the meeting on Tuesday at the Dewars Centre, Mr Leckie said he would have to consider the cost of reapplying as significant costs had already been incurred.

He described the process as “frustrating” is it had been more than three years since the plans were formulated and they had wished to to gauge the council’s stance on such a development before moving on to detailed planning.

“If it becomes so difficult we could go elsewhere,” he said.

“We have got to figure out the commerciality of it.”