Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Calls for planning department probe amid Scone housing row

Protesters install signs at the roadside in Scone.
Protesters install signs at the roadside in Scone.

The SNP’s Pete Wishart has called for an independent investigation of a council planning office amid growing unrest over a huge housing project at Perthshire’s biggest village.

Campaigners at Scone say they have been left “absolutely stunned and extremely angry” that newly-elected councillors will be asked to debate the controversial Scone North proposal as early as next week.

They argue it gives members of the development management committee — more than half of whom were formally appointed on Wednesday — just a few days to get through about 1,400 pages of documents and more than 900 objections.

As revealed in Thursday’s Courier, Perth and Kinross Council has refused to delay the talks, despite pressure from Deputy First Minister John Swinney.

Now Mr Wishart said the matter must not be considered until there is a full probe of the planning department’s decision.

01/04/14 Sunday Post, Chris Austin Perth Pete Wishart, SNP MP and ex Runrig rock star in his local constituency of Perth. Words: Tracey Bryce
Pete Wishart in Perth

“I could not believe that this controversial planning application in Scone is to be considered when a new council has barely got its feet under the table,” he said.

“Councillors untrained in planning issues will now be expected to digest all these pages of text with associated documents, along with over 900 comments of objections.”

He said: “The decision about considering this application must be taken off next week’s development management agenda, and it must not be presented for consideration before Perth and Kinross planning department has been independently investigated over the handling of this application.”

Mr Wishart said that a crucial dispute over the Cross Tay Link Road (CTLR) had still not been resolved.

Planning chiefs have given their backing to the plan, despite objectors’ worries about its impact on traffic and already worryingly high pollution levels.

In a report to councillors, interim head of planning Nick Brian insisted that only 100 properties could be built before the CTLR is deemed a “committed” project.

Originally, council officers had said the second phase of the development could not go ahead until the crossing had been built.

Mr Brian said: “For clarification, the CTLR becomes a committed project when all funding, land required for the scheme, statutory approvals, trunk road orders and consents are in place, a contractor appointed and construction on site has commenced.”

He said that the increase in traffic caused by the first 100 houses would be approximately 3%, less than the 5% threshold.

“The remainder of the residential units will not be recommended for approval at the detailed stages until the CTLR is a committed project, which will see a net improvement in traffic impacts, particularly in Bridgend,” Mr Brian added.

He said that an independent air quality assessment carried out by the community council was not applicable because it was based on English guidelines.

A council spokeswoman said that the item will remain on Wednesday’s agenda.

She added: “The Head of Legal and Governance has already reviewed the procedures undertaken with regard to this application and is satisfied that the council has followed due process.”

Tory candidate Ian Duncan said: “There are a number of unanswered questions about this development leftover from the period of the previous council administration.”

He added: “I am well aware from the canvassing I have been doing in Scone about the level of public concern there is over this development. Therefore, I am very sympathetic to the view that there should be a deferral to allow new councillors a fuller opportunity to acquaint themselves with the issues around this application.

“I understand it will be open to objectors or indeed members of the new development control committee to propose a deferral at next week’s meeting.”