Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Transport Scotland blames council chiefs for Oudenarde debacle, private e-mails reveal

The Oudenarde site at Bridge of Earn.
The Oudenarde site at Bridge of Earn.

Transport Scotland has accused Perth and Kinross Council of mistakes which derailed long-standing plans for a new 1,500-home village on the outskirts of Perth.

The Scottish Government controversially seized control of the Oudenarde project in January, just as councillors were ready to approve plans for the first phase of development.

The move angered developer Geoff Brown, who said he was preparing to take the case to the Court of Session.

Now papers released by the government have revealed the behind-the-scenes scramble to halt the project, showing that Transport Scotland lay the blame for the debacle at the council’s feet.

An e-mail to Kevin Stewart MSP minister for local government and housing, from Holyrood planners, claimed that a planning condition insisted upon by Transport Scotland had been omitted by mistake when plans for the site were finalised.

The roads authority was unhappy that the council was going to approve stage one — a total of 159 houses — without a condition insisting that paperwork was in place showing how the site at the old Bridge of Earn hospital would link safely to the M90.

In a letter to then planning boss Nick Brian, Transport Scotland’s national operations manager Stuart Wilson wrote that the government body had tried to promote the development “whilst maintaining the clear need to maintain the safety and efficiency of the road network”.

In the note from January this year — two days before the application was called in — he said: “It is through a series of procedural errors on the part of the council that we find ourselves in the situation that Transport Scotland’s requested planning conditions… have not been imposed with significant implications for efficient and safe operation of the strategic road network.”

Mr Wilson added he was disappointed that a report which went before councillors did not “accurately reflect the exhaustive, and complex, background context to the position taken by Transport Scotland”.

In further correspondence, released following a freedom of information request, an email between Transport Scotland and senior planners at the Scottish Government said that project leaders GS Brown had written to the council in October 2017, asking for the Transport Scotland condition to be removed claiming it “would impose a burden that could be a dealbreaker”.

A follow-up email reveals the Scottish Government wanted the council to delay its decision. A planner wrote: “The short-term solution is to get the council to postpone the application going to committee on Wednesday.

“This allows some breathing room for the main parties to get together and have a proper discussion around the way forward.

“The council are being pressured by the developer to reach a decision, but any intervention we have at our disposal would cause significant delays.”

The government’s planning and environmental appeals department is expected to rule on the development before the end of June.