Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Perth and Kinross Matters: Political row highlights a need for honesty and transparency

Health board meeting at Perth & Kinross Council about mental health charities is changed from public to private with little notice.
Health board meeting at Perth & Kinross Council about mental health charities is changed from public to private with little notice.

Once upon a time, not too long ago, there was something reassuringly mundane about Perth and Kinross Council meetings.

You knew which decisions would be passed or which projects supported, just by counting the political colours in the room.

Councillors from one party would vote for this, and councillors from another party would vote for that.

Whoever had the majority wins. Simple, right?

But in February, something strange started happening.

Tory councillors Colin Stewart and Calum Purves failed to turn up for the all-important budget talks, leaving the administration on a knife-edge. It later emerged they could not support their party’s proposed 4% council tax hike.

The following month, a new row erupted after Mr Purves voted against his administration’s plan to shut Blairingone School.

And in June, Mr Stewart spoke out against the council’s flagship Cross Tay Link Road project, describing its proposed route as “stupidity on stilts.”

Now both councillors find themselves at the centre of a new political storm.

And no one seems to know how it’s going to end.

The pair were suspended after complaints were made against them, following a shambolic meeting (or non-meeting) of the local Integration Joint Board in July.

The exact nature of the complaints hasn’t been made public – it’s understood voices were raised behind closed doors – but the public that attended the meeting are fully supportive of both councillors, who today face being ejected from the board.

The Standards Commission’s investigation needs to be allowed to run its course and eventually we will find out if there were genuine concerns about behaviour or – as some have claimed – it was part of an orchestrated campaign against two councillors who refuse to tow the party line.

But after the now notorious (non) meeting it is obvious that the IJB needs councillors on board, who aren’t afraid to hold other members to account.

The public was treated disrespectfully at the meeting, with no attempt to compromise or properly explain the reasons behind the cancellation.

Whatever happens at this afternoon’s council talks, this whole episode has been another semi-scandal for an administration that has seen its majority drop from eight to minus two in just over two years.

As has been shown with a similar debacle over Bridge of Earn surgery, the public deserves honesty and transparency when important decisions are being made about them.